Brain clues to attention disorder
k p Collins
kpaulc at [----------]earthlink.net
Sun Jan 11 05:07:56 EST 2004
"k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:yP8Mb.3325$i4.794 at newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net>
> Newsgroups: bionet.neuroscience,sci.med.psychobiology
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:16 AM
> Subject: Re: Brain clues to attention disorder
> > <orkeltatte at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:84da9680.0401071116.12d81392 at posting.google.com...
> > > "k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote in message
> > news:<D2RKb.13553$6B.13518 at newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
> > > > [...]
> > [...]
> > > "What is greater - to think "right" or think "free"?
> > [Th]ink in a way that 'moves toward' Truth - both are in-it.
> > > My personal standpoint on this is that there is no "right" hence it
> > > must be greater to think free.
> > 'Move toward' Truth, be as Free as one can be.
> > As far as 'being right' goes, it's irrelevant, as long as one does,
> > in fact, 'move toward' Truth.
> > How does one 'move toward' Truth?
> > How does one know the direction in which to 'move'
> > in order to 'move toward' Truth?
> > Within physical reality, one 'moves away from' WDB2T.
> > 'Moving toward' Truth is 'moving toward' least-dis-order.
> > It's Easy.
> > All one has to do is 'range-widely' enough to see beyond
> > local order-'maximums' - 'climb' WDB2T, and, from 'there'
> > see where it's good to 'move toward' the further 'climbing'
> > that's always out-there.
> > [BTW, in the sense invoked, here, "order" is not some
> > 'dictatorial' stuff. That kind of 'order' is as a straight-jacket.
> > In the sense invoked here, "order" is that which enables one
> > to do-more than one can, 'presently', do - which is 'just'-the-
> > opposite of enduring 'dictatorship' [or 'wearing" a straight-jacket].
> > And why the seeking of such "order" is Worthy is that, 'moving
> > toward' it, simultaneously, enables one to not only allow others
> > to 'move toward' it, but to assist others in 'moving toward' it.
> > All 'automatically' - because it's in-it that imposing dis-order
> > u[p]on others imposes dis-order upon one's self.]
> > Easy choice.
> > [...]
> But there is one 'Difficulty' inherent.
> 'being right' =always= correlates to a WDB2T relative-
> maximum - the 'top of a hill' in terms of WDB2T.
> And to 'move toward' any higher [more-'maximum' :-]
> 'top of a hill', in terms of WDB2T, it's most-often the
> case that one has to 'traverse' one, or more, WDB2T-'valley'.
> But, when such is attempted, "rendering useless" occurs
> within one's nervous system, be-cause, 'moving away from'
> the WDB2T-'hill-top' and 'moving toward' the WDB2T-
> 'valley' constitutes a 'relinquishing' 'order - which occurs
> within nervous systems as TD E/I(up).
> It's what I was talking about when I said, "As far as 'being
> right' goes, it's irrelevant, as long as one does, in fact, 'move
> toward' Truth."
> Get it?
> 'moving toward' augmented-TD E/I-minimization most-
> often requires one to experience intervening decreased-
> TD E/I-minimization.
> But, if one is "Hell-bent" on 'being right', one cannot
> 'move' in this way. Instead, one remains 'stuck' upon
> the 'familiar' WDB2T-'hill-top' that one has formerly
> Get it?
> There's =so much=, within 'modern' interactive dynamics
> that acts to 'prevent' folks from 'traversing' through the
> WDB2T-'valleys' that intervene between relative-WDB2T-
> If one insists on 'being right', one is 'trapped', even though
> one's nervous system is fully capable of such 'traverses'.
> Shall we have the Courage to 'move toward' Truth.
> To understand the 'valleys', rather than 'fear' them.
> Or shall the 'valleys' continue to 'Dictate' our Beings?
> K. P. Collins
America is, even now, being put to the Test with respect
"O'Neill: Plan to Hit Iraq Began Pre-9/11
By Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, January 11, 2004; Page A13"
"`It was all about finding a way to do it,' O'Neill
said. `That was the tone of it. The president saying,
`Go find me a way to do this.'"
How will America - =all of us together= Choose?
Shall we have the Courage to 'traverse' the 'valleys'
that stand-between us?
Or shell we 'be right', and stand on our mutually-exclusive
'hill-tops', shouting at one another?
Shall we 'be right'?
Or shall we 'move toward' Truth?
And what shall you folks, in all other Lands,
In this Choice, is the Future of Humanity.
K. P. Collins
More information about the Neur-sci