I've claimed the Clay Maths Institute's Millenium Prize re the Reimann Hypothesis
lancesherman at insightBB.com
Mon Jul 19 09:23:21 EST 2004
I think Ken's spelling is correct.
"Peter F." <effectivespamblock at ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:NE7Kc.271$7R.12904 at nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
> Hi Ken,
> You have misspelled Riemann - shame if that alone would cause your
> to be rejected!
> Good luck!
> "Collinskppc" <collinskppc at wmconnect.com-T-R-I-M> wrote in message
> news:20040716152904.22984.00001783 at mb-m07.wmconnect.com...
> > 2004-07-16 [written at "Far Reach"]
> > To the Clay Mathematics Institute's Reimann Hypothesis Millenium Prize
> > Governing Committee:
> > I, hereby, claim the Clay Institute's Millenium Prize with respect to
> > Reimann Hypothesis.
> > Below, I Prove an arithmetic equivalent of the Reimann Conjecture, and
> > disclose, completely, the True nature of Reimann's zeta function.
> > End note: The essence of the Reimann Hypothesis is
> > that simplicity is what made it seem "hard" to folks who attacked it via
> > high-level Mathematics.
More information about the Neur-sci