Anyone read a really bad paper recently?

Glen M. Sizemore gmsizemore2 at yahoo.com
Wed May 5 04:26:30 EST 2004


B: Anyone got anything really offensive, you know, no stats.



GS: FYI, there is a small minority of practicing scientists and
technologists that argue that the widespread use of null-hypothesis
statistical testing is largely misguided (p<.05).



"BilZ0r" <BilZ0r at TAKETHISOUThotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns94E0C31E66611BilZ0rhotmailcom at 202.20.93.13...
> I need to write some reviewer comments on a published paper. I've found
> lots of papers which have one large glearing error, but none that have
lots
> of little bad things, you know systemically bad, or really enough to fill
> more than 100 words.
>
> Anyone got anything really offensive, you know, no stats, or even better,
> in correct stats, bad grammer, self-contradictory results, or mislabeled
> graphs?





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list