Anyone read a really bad paper recently?
BilZ0r at TAKETHISOUThotmail.com
Sat May 8 17:47:37 EST 2004
fburton at nyx10.nyx.net (Francis Burton) wrote in news:1084052325.300111
> In article <b0561e71.0405080919.1759d113 at posting.google.com>,
> bob <rboehrin at vt.edu> wrote:
>>I do not know. All I know is that this paper should never have made
>>it through a peer review process.
> It's worrying that such glaring errors managed to get through the
> review process. Usually (or at least in my field) reviewers are
> like sharks trying to pick up the scent of blood!
>>If you are interested in the Rosen paper I can send you a link to a
>>place that reconsiders the issues and does the work correctly.
> Sounds like it might be useful - go ahead.
I second that!
More information about the Neur-sci