Wolf Kirchmeir wrote:
> Stargazer wrote:
> > However, Mr. Kirchmeir's post said that the main functions of dog's
> > brains and human's brains are "exactly the same", and this sounds
> > wrong. Dog's (and most other mammals) brains don't have similarly
> > developed frontal lobes. They also don't have Broca's and Wernicke's
> > areas so clear-cut. These brains are similar, but on their main
> > functions not strictly comparable.
> > *SG*
>> OK, so "exactly" was an exaggeration - but the OP claimed that the
> basic functions were different, w/ IMO is nonsense. The differences
> adduced (eg, language) are not "basic functions" -- they arise from
> differences in relative size and complexity of different parts of the brain in
> different species. Of course, such differences matter - but they don't
> change the basic functions of the brain, they build on and elaborate
> There now, is that clearer?
Yes, it's clearer now, thank you.
Too bad it's still wrong. Differences between the brains of humans
and most other mammals are small, indeed, but they are important.
For instance, there's a bundle of axons (known as arcuate fasciculus)
connecting Wernicke's area to Broca's area which is essential to
the development of linguistic competence in humans. No other mammal
(other than close primates) have such peculiar organization. This,
of course, not to mention the frontal lobe.