First Causes

[Bernardz]

In article <413c719f.22600721 at netnews.att.net>, 
lesterDELzick at worldnet.att.net says...
> What's noteworthy in all three instances, however, is that no one ever
> proved anything regarding first causes
> 

Is the word causes a spelling mistake?

Anyway its a bit hard to prove. Perhaps its better to say no one can 
think of a likely scenario that could produce a first cause. All 
explanations seem to be shifted slightly further back in time. 

-- 
These is always a page that we are looking for and there is always a 
note, that we have lost that we now really need now.


Observations of Bernard - No 66