First Causes

Bernardz Bernard_zzz at
Tue Sep 7 05:52:41 EST 2004

In article <413c719f.22600721 at>, 
lesterDELzick at says...
> What's noteworthy in all three instances, however, is that no one ever
> proved anything regarding first causes

Is the word causes a spelling mistake?

Anyway its a bit hard to prove. Perhaps its better to say no one can 
think of a likely scenario that could produce a first cause. All 
explanations seem to be shifted slightly further back in time. 

These is always a page that we are looking for and there is always a 
note, that we have lost that we now really need now.

Observations of Bernard - No 66

More information about the Neur-sci mailing list