flaws inherent in your argument. The fact is that your arguments lack
external validity based on scientific arguments. The logical structure
of your entire argument falls apart upon consideration because your
premises are faulty and based upon what appears to be limited
understanding of neuroscience research and cognitive AI studies.
Your bluster attempt to buffalo learned readers of this group gives no
credit. Nor does your unsubtle and infantile threat that
>These are slanderous accusations, Mr. Longley, with
>probable legal consequences.
Your threat, like your argument, is invalid and ridiculous because
slander applies to the spoken, not written word.