SciAm article [was Happy Groundhog Day!]
kenneth.p.collins at worldnet.att.net
Fri Feb 4 10:45:54 EST 2005
"kenneth collins" <kenneth.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:CQzMd.1851$Th1.937 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
There is one thing that, if it's True,
will turn out to be extremely-import-
ant with respect to "memory".
It's the way that it's discussed in the
article that "high frequency" activation
that's artificially applied [to hippocamp-
al slices] has to be "separated" by
"pauses" if the "synaptic strengthening"
upon which the author focuses is to
All this is is an artificial "recreation" of
'the' 3-D energydynamics that are in-
herent in the dynamics of "active-pass-
ive phase shifts" as they've been dis-
cussed in AoK, Ap5 and Ap7, all
When the "high frequency" stimula-
tion is "paused", the 3-D energy-
dynamics of the subject neuron lit-
erally reverse Directionalities.
This 'replicates' the central 3-D en-
ergydynamic of that occurs within
"passive-active phase shifts", and
which, as I discussed in another re-
cent post in the "On Janov's view"
thread, is what instantiates "mem-
ory" consolidation. [In the other
thread, I discussed how this Fact
can literally be used to Direct the
formation of "non-Swiss-cheesy-
memory". I Encourage everyone
to learn the stuff of that discussion.]
So this part of the results that the
author reports is Significant.
Why I didn't make-the-connection
1. It "pissed-me-off" to read of the
author's emphasis on non-physically-
and 2. It was only in the other thread
that my attention was focused upon
the =supersystem-wide= dynamics
of active-passive phase shifts with
respect to "memory"-consolidation.
So, from there, as ongoing TD E/I-
minimization occurred within my nerv-
ous system [with an intervening sleep-
ing [see my long-former discussions
with Dag], that I connected this part
of what the author discussed in the
SciAm article with the global dyn-
amics of active-passive phase-shifts.
But the necessity of "pauses" be-
tween "high frequency" artificially-
applied activation definitely, if
crudely, correlates to the naturally-
occurring 3-D energydynamics
"reversals" that =always= occur
within the 3-D energydynamics of
Such phase shifts are easily seen
to coincide-directly to =specific=
"information-points" that are of
relatively-high significance -- be-
cause, when the phase shifts oc-
cur, it's =always= because there's
been a significant variation in glo-
bal TD E/I -- and that's =precisely=
the stuff that it's Important to "cap-
ture" within "memory" -- be-cause
it coincides-directly to stuff in the
host organism's experiential external
environment that "countermanded"
the TD E/I-minimization that was
going on when the "supersystem
configurations" that embody phase
"Remembering" that stuff is Important
within long-term TD E/I-minimization
because it coincides with stuff that
"makes a difference", which is exactly
what the phase shifts that are discussed
in AoK physically-embody [as has been
explained in AoK all along].
But the author's emphasis on non-phys-
ically-real 'time' just really "pissed-me-
It's =NOT= 'time', 'dammit' :-]
If one invokes non-physically-real 'time',
to the degree that one does so, one
cannot =See= the energy-gradients
that literally empower nervous system
function -- which leaves 'invisible'
everything that needs to be Seen, if
nervous system function is to be un-
In the stuff that I'm addressing, here,
of what the author wrote, saying that
it's "time" says absolutely =NOTHING=,
so why say such?
Why, when 'just' seeing the 3-D energy-
gradients discloses =everything= that
empowers cellular function?
Non-physically-real 'time' is =just= an
Ancient =ERROR= that had been
handed-down, intergenerationally, be-
cause it correlates with groupwise-
tion -- =NOT= anything that actually
has Existence outside of what's mere-
ly become 'familiar' [TD E/I-minimized]
within nervous systems via 'blindly'-
automated intergenerational "repetition".
Invoking non-physically-real 'time' =blocks=
comprehension of nervous system function.
Why do such?
But, if it is True, the stuff I've discussed in
this post, of that which is discussed in the
SciAm article, is Important, as is discussed
k. p. collins
More information about the Neur-sci