Why is there such a lack of interest in neuroscience?

Sir Frederick mmcneill at fuzzysys.com
Sun Jan 9 08:21:52 EST 2005


On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 07:35:22 GMT, "kenneth collins"
<kenneth.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote:

>"Sir Frederick" <mmcneill at fuzzysys.com> wrote in message 
>news:ss21u0l640r04ibp8d5nrh0qgb0pe9ihte at 4ax.com...
>| Why is there such a lack of interest in neuroscience?
>| The whole issue of brain structure and function is IMO
>| the most important of all.
>| --
>| Best,
>| Frederick Martin McNeill
>| [...]
>
>Neuroscience is just about as important
>as anything gets.
>
>You are correct.
>
>It's also as hard-to-do as anything
>gets, so that's why only relatively-
>few embrace doing it.
>
>Cheers, ken 
>
I "do" neuroscience by being alive, with brain.
Are other people dead or without brain, thus no 
embracing?

Why are you the author of a majority of the posts here?



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list