[Neuroscience] A Fun-Thought

kenneth collins kenneth.p.collins at worldnet.att.net
Mon Jun 13 22:11:59 EST 2005


"kenneth collins" <kenneth.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message 
news:y%9re.315227$cg1.259320 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| [...]

The "title" is True,
But Thought's =Serious=, too.

Be-cause of nervous systems'
"special topological homeomorph-
isms" [AoK, "Short Paper"], which
orders everything that they do in an
on-the-inside-looking-out way, they
literally physically-emulate the dyn-
amics of the SSW<->UES harmon-
ics, and =that= is whence comes
their Abilities to =Know= physical
reality.

Get it?

Just as "SSWs" are 'contained-
within' the UES, nervous systems'
functionings are 'contained-within'
their individually-unique external
experience.

Nervous systems' functionings
"press"-against all of the "stimula-
tion" that "presses"-against them,
and, to the degree that TD E/I-
minimization occurs within such,
"Knowing" "nucleates" within a
nervous system.

It's my Analysis that it's this way
be-cause evolutionary dynamics
had, as their "starting-point", the
SSW<->UES harmonics, and
what better way to "Know" phys-
ical reality than to become as it
is in all of its combinitorially-var-
iable richness?

Get it?

Given the SSW<->UES harmonics,
the "special topological homeomorph-
ism" is the only Possible result.

TD E/I-minimization enables the
"nucleation" of "Knowing" despite
physical reality's combinatorial-
richness -- be-cause it literally in-
ternalizes the Generalized Nature
of the SSW<->UES harmonics.

Have Fun while working-it-through
in your own good ol' noggin' labs.

But remember, at the same 'time',
that it's also Extremely-Serious.

There's huge, Unitary, order, with-
in it.

[Sidebar: This's why I had to re-
write Physics. The "disorder" in-
herent in the "traditional" approach
to Physics was so extreme that it
was 'blinding' folks to what was in
the Neuroscience Experimental
data.

The Verification of the existence of
"the special topological homeomorph-
ism" was =just= sitting-there, in text-
books and in the Neuroscience stacks,
and folks couldn't see it because the
prevailing "model" of "how things are
supposed to be done in science" was
taken from the then-prevailing approach
to Physics, and that had folks in Neuro-
science believing that they "had to"
formalize nervous system function in
terms of 'particle'-interactions, "in the
manner of the, then-existing "consensus"
with respect to "how physics is supposed
to be done".

The result was exactly-analogous
to the way that Ptolemaic "earth-
centeredness" stood-in-the-way-of
Progress in folks' understanding of
the cosmos, including Newton's
"Law of Universal Gravitation".

Get rid of the stuff that blocks
comprehension ["earth-centeredness",
"epicycles", the "celestial spheres", etc.,
and...

"Zwwiiiipppp!!!"

Implosi-mundo.

Neuroscience?

Get rid of "disconnected" 'particles',
and, instead, See energy-flow-Directed-
ness [which "Seeing" is what the "special
topological homeomorphism" is all about
[how it came to be as it is, and why it did],
and same-old, same-old.

The "scales fall from one's eyes", and one
can See, and See-more. Ever-more.]

I have to 'take-a-break'. Be back when
I can.

k. p. collins




More information about the Neur-sci mailing list