Tapered Harmony Primer [again -- was other stuff]
kenneth.p.collins at worldnet.att.net
Sun Mar 20 22:36:13 EST 2005
"kenneth collins" <kenneth.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:ZWi%d.424782$w62.80029 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| Tapered Harmony's view is more-compre-
| hensive than this because it explains exactly
| how and why light of a specific incident
| frequency can result of the emission of a
| =range= of kinetic energies from 'atoms'.
Just in case what's quoted, above, from
my prior post [linked-to above] comes
across folks who've "mean streaks" --
there are no "errors" in-it.
I said, in the Molecular Biology stuff
I've also been discussing, that I wanted
to work on an "energy-conversion"
I did, but while posting this discussion
of the Basics of Tapered Harmony, I
realized that I'd already Solved the
I'd like to run it by folks, in-person, be-
fore saying that it's "Definitely" so, but
expect there'll be some Usefulness in
the Solution, with respect to Human-
I think I've made it back to 'where'
there's only 95% of the work I've done
remaining to be communicated :-]
While I'm "just-in-case"-ing, I've under-
stood that folks think I'm 'this or that' be-
cause I've not been able to get any of
the work I've done Formally Published.
But, step-back, a bit, and you'll see
why it's been so.
My work is all beneath-the-Founda-
Papers that "contradict" 'foundation'
stuff don't even get read, let alone
sent out to be Reviewed.
I did what Needed to be done, any-
=That= is what I am.
I Love you in that way.
K. P. Collins
More information about the Neur-sci