[Neuroscience] Re: Wherefore art thou Neuron Code?
Entertained by my own EIMC
via neur-sci%40net.bio.net
(by write_to_eimc from ozemail.com.au)
Mon Apr 2 08:49:47 EST 2007
"Glen M. Sizemore" <gmsizemore2 from yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4610ed18$0$24160$ed362ca5 from nr2.newsreader.com...
<snip>
> The general point to be made is that, in many, many cases in neuroscience,
> behavior hasn't been broken down into the right analytical units - that
> is, the conceptual structure inherited from mainstream psychology is,
> literally, nonsense.
You obvously both have a valid point AND get to feel good by making it.
> Note that, despite Kandel's careless
> language, "habituation" is conceptually clean.
IOW, it is a concept you can understand.
More information about the Neur-sci
mailing list