<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2719.2200" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE="CITE">
<STYLE></STYLE>
<TABLE height=100 cellSpacing=0 width="90%" border=1>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD width=80 bgColor=#ffc4c4><IMG height=100 alt=Berserker
src="cid:part1.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=133 border=0></TD>
<TD vAlign=center align=middle bgColor=#cc3300>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="90%" border=1>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD bgColor=#ffffff>
<CENTER><B><FONT color=#ff0000>"GEE, I'M NOT A RACIST,
WHY...ER...UM...AH..."</FONT></B> <BR><B><FONT color=#ff0000>by H.
Millard (c)
2002</FONT></B></CENTER></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="90%" border=0>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=+1>I'm getting sick of hearing white people mewling that
they're not racists every time some hate filled anti-white bigot uses
the term racist to shut the white person up. Such cowardice harms all
white people, because it emboldens the anti-white bigots. </FONT>
<P><FONT size=+1>I've also getting sick of seeing "we're not racists"
disclaimers on some pro-white Web sites. It's gotten so silly that many
timid whites can't say anything at all about race without first saying
"I'm not a racist...." By contrast, I've heard very few non-whites ever
claim that they aren't racists. I also don't know of any pro-black,
pro-Asian, or pro-Hispanic Web sites that have any such disclaimers that
they're not racist. </FONT> <BR> </P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="90%" border=0>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=+1>I don't care what kind of cowardly spin timid whites
put on the we're not racist disclaimers. By even using the disclaimers
they're proving that they are weak and effete. You know what weak means.
My dictionary defines effete as: exhausted; no longer capable of
producing; spent and sterile; lacking vigor, lacking force of character,
lacking moral stamina; decadent; soft. That's how I would describe many
of those who use these disclaimers, and also, sadly, how I would
generally describe many white people in society today. </FONT>
<P><FONT size=+1>Notwithstanding this condemnation, however, some timid
pro-white Web sites do serve their purpose as a threshold for other
timid whites who are just starting to wake up to the reality that they
are white and alone on a dark planet whose dark peoples want (on a gene
level, at least) to destroy them. Such Web sites allow such awakening
whites to take a few tentative steps toward a higher
consciousness.</FONT> <BR> </P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="90%" border=0>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=+1>Still, a bold vibrant people does not apologize for
being as it is and for wanting to remain as it is and to not want to
become extinct. A bold vibrant people does not show up in history, hat
in hand, begging to be allowed to survive and to BE. A bold vibrant
people fights for the right to BE and refuses to take an inferior
position to any other people. Such a bold vibrant people recognizes no
human authority over it that it can even beg from. Such a people refuses
to lie down like a whipped dog that has lost its spirit, and give up the
struggle to BE.</FONT>
<P><IMG height=100 alt='"White Power"'
src="cid:part2.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=66 align=right
border=0 ?> <BR> </P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="90%" border=0>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=+1>I visited the Web site of a pro-white group the other
day and the first few words on the site tell visitors that the site
isn't racist and that the group rejects racism. I wondered to myself why
the group rejects racism. How can they be for one race and reject
racism? Of course, I know that what they were really trying to say was
that they don't want to have to waste space to give a proper definition
to racism so everyone will know that they aren't pushing racial hatred,
which is something different than racism. </FONT>
<P><IMG height=100 alt="Pedro Sanchez Rischajche"
src="cid:part3.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=89 align=left
border=0><IMG height=100 alt=SharonWilcoxson
src="cid:part4.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=79 align=right
border=0><FONT size=+1>The truth is that racism is benign. It's a
philosophical view that says, in its original sense, that one believes
the races of man are different from each other. Isn't that the truth?
Aren't the races different from each other? Can't we see a few of the
main differences? Are we to pretend that there are no differences? And,
if we pretend there are no differences, isn't this one of the first
steps toward the genocide of distinct races? Aren't those who are
pushing the idea that race doesn't exist or who are attempting to
minimize racial differences, in our minds, really attacking us and
trying to destroy us as a distinct people? You know they are.</FONT>
<BR> </P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="90%" border=0>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=+1>They're trying to get the ten percent of humans on
this dark planet who are white to mate and blend in with the ninety
percent of the humans who aren't white. Such a blending is
genocide. </FONT>
<P><IMG height=100 alt=Samoan
src="cid:part5.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=73 align=left
border=0><IMG height=100 alt="Christina Burmeister"
src="cid:part6.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=80 align=right
border=0><FONT size=+1>Some timid souls will argue that because we've
let the anti-white bigots redefine the word "racism" to mean "hate" that
we must be sensitive and use the word as they have defined it. I believe
we should reject this view. Without the use of this and other words, we
have a hard time thinking about the reality of race and genes. Humans
think in words and we need words to think. If we do not use the right
words in the correct ways, we are cutting off our thoughts. If we let
others take away our words, we're letting them take away not only our
freedom of expression, but also our very freedom of thought, which is
the spring from which our expression comes. </FONT>
<P><IMG height=100 alt="Vsolt Racz"
src="cid:part7.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=82 align=left
border=0><IMG height=100 alt="Christina Neal"
src="cid:part8.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=84 align=right
border=0><FONT size=+1>But, let's be very direct. Racism is a valid
scientific/intellectual/ philosophical view of man. Unlike some other
unscientific/anti-intellectual/philosophical views of man, racism
actually does hold up in reality and it does explain the nature of man
and much of existence as existence relates to living things. To deny
that one is a racist is to deny that one sees differences among the
races of man. We must add, though, that there is a problem with the word
racism in that it is too confining. Since the word race is used only for
different human groups and doesn't encompass the whole panoply of life,
of which humans are a part, the term racism fails to convey the basic
principles behind the philosophy. Perhaps this belief system called
racism should actually be called "geneism" since this would be a more
accurate expression of the belief system. However, since this later term
is still not in wide use, as meant here, we are left with the word
racism.</FONT> <BR> </P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="90%" border=0>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><IMG height=100 alt=pygmy
src="cid:part9.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=87 align=left
border=0><IMG height=100 alt="Jeanne Clery"
src="cid:part10.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=123 align=right
border=0><FONT size=+1>The essential thing to remember is that genes and
their collective expression as race in humans (and, "breeds" in dogs and
similar group terms in other species) are the most important element in
life. Another important thing to keep in mind is the fact that we are
carriers of our genes and in a sense, the genes are directing us in ways
that will protect them, and us. </FONT>
<P><FONT size=+1>Of course, those who are trying to destroy the reality
of separate races try to deny the reality of separate races partly by
saying that there are no "pure races." Of course, they are right. This
is so, because although races are steps toward the development of
different species of humans incapable of breeding with one another, we
have not had human isolation for a long enough period <IMG
height=100 alt="Hoang Phuong Nguyen"
src="cid:part11.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=80 align=left><IMG
height=100 alt="Shannon Schieber"
src="cid:part12.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=106 align=right
border=0>of time to have any of the present races become separate
species--at least as species is usually defined. Because such cross
breeding is possible among the races, and because there is no real human
isolation, such cross breeding has and does take place, and this keeps
races from being purely this or purely that. This has also kept any
human race from separating more from the mass of humanity into a
separate species that can no longer cross breed with the rest of
humanity.</FONT> <BR> </P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="90%" border=0>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><IMG height=100 alt="Chinese man"
src="cid:part13.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=86 align=left
border=0><FONT size=+1>However, the argument that there are no pure
races is a red herring. We don't have to have pure races in order to
have races. There are different races. We can see different peoples and
we can classify like with like based on the sensory information we
receive. The reason we have our senses is so that we can survive by
knowing like from unlike, dangerous from not dangerous, Us from not Us.
Those who want to destroy separate races are telling us not to believe
our senses. They are wrong. </FONT>
<P><IMG height=100 alt="Keith Huffman"
src="cid:part14.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=71 align=left
border=0><IMG height=100 alt="Elin Nordegren"
src="cid:part15.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=84 align=right
border=0><FONT size=+1>Now even though there has been a minor blending
of races over the centuries, we can still tell the difference between
white people and non-white people. There may be shades of brown mixed
in, but on the whole, we know who is white and who is not. We can also,
if we want, decide what constitutes the ideal of each race and say that
this ideal is what this or that race is, when in its purest form, and is
freer of genes blended in from other races. </FONT>
<P><FONT size=+1>We don't need to do a genetic study to determine these
ideals. Again, all we need to do is use our senses and our
brains.</FONT> <BR> </P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="90%" border=0>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><IMG height=100 alt="Moises Sepulveda Sr"
src="cid:part16.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=85 align=left
border=0><IMG height=100 alt="Lori Roscetti"
src="cid:part17.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=73 align=right
border=0><FONT size=+1>How would we determine what is the white ideal?
What would the purest white person look like? To answer this, we would
have to look at why there are white people at all. White people, as have
all peoples, developed from other human types as a response to
environmental conditions. For example, whites are especially adapted to
cool, rainy lands with cloud covered skies. We know this, in part, and
just as one bit of evidence, because we know that white skin allows in
more of the sun's rays in such a climate so that a proper amount of
Vitamin D can be produced. Black skin, on the other hand, is designed to
keep out more of the sun's rays so that too much Vitamin D isn't
produced. With this little piece of knowledge, we can then say that a
white person must be--please excuse the simplicity of this--white. So,
an ideal white person must be white. We can go on with most other
characteristics in the same way to actually reverse engineer an ideal
white person or an ideal any other type of person. </FONT>
<P><IMG height=100 alt="Tyrone Perkins"
src="cid:part18.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=74 align=left
border=0><IMG height=90 alt="Roberta Louise Happe"
src="cid:part19.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=120 align=right
border=0><FONT size=+1>Nature is a very efficient engineer. It designs
life with economy and functionality. Races have arisen to fit certain
niches in nature. It's as though nature were given a contract to design
human creatures for different conditions. The spec sheet for whites
might say something like this: Supply a humanoid creature that is
self-replicating. It must be able to live and prosper in a cool climate
with clouds and lots of rain. It must be able to find food where it
lives. So, what does nature do? Just what a human engineer does. A human
engineer doesn't start from scratch, but works from what already exists
and modifies it. In the case of nature, an earlier human form is taken
and modified much the way someone might modify a VW Beetle into
a <IMG height=100 alt="dune buggy"
src="cid:part20.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=153 align=right
border=0>dune buggy. Now, to follow this example further, at first the
dune buggy and the VW Beetle will have many interchangeable parts, but
as time goes on, the Dune Buggy may be modified more and more to be more
efficient for use in the sand. This may cause a change in the engine or
other major components. Eventually, the dune buggy may be so different
from the VW Beetle, that it will, in a sense, be of a different
species.</FONT> <BR> </P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="90%" border=0>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><IMG height=100 alt=Maori
src="cid:part21.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=74 align=left
border=0><FONT size=+1>Our natural instincts and many of our natural
desires, which we often think are part of our free will, are often
really just our genes telling us things. For example, we are often
naturally attracted to people who look a certain way because of what our
genes are telling us. Our genes want to spread their kind, and to do
this we need to mate with those who have the same kind of genes. So, our
genes, in a healthy person, will influence in our mating choices. Again,
a healthy person, often finds people who look different to be
unattractive. The reason is because our outward appearance is gene
caused, and gives quick visual clues to who is Us and who is not
Us. </FONT>
<P><IMG height=100 alt="Anni-Frid Synni Lyngstad"
src="cid:part22.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=109 align=right
border=0><FONT size=+1>This may seem unnecessary to say, but you have a
right to be white. You have a right to associate only with other whites
if this is your wish. You have a right to not date non-whites. If you
want to have your family remain white, listen to your
genes. </FONT></P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="90%" border=0>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=+1># #
# </FONT></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR> <BR>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="90%" border=0>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD bgColor=#fef7de>
<CENTER><B>TWO ICONOCLASTIC BOOKS BY H. MILLARD!</B> <BR>(Available at
finer bookstores, by phone, or on the net) <BR>The links appear to
work on some software and not on others. If they don’t work, you can
order via phone. </CENTER></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="90%" border=0>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD bgColor=#fef7de><A
href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0595228119/qid=1025648466/ref=sr_11_0_1/103-2518112-3866267"><IMG
height=150 alt="Roaming the Wastelands"
src="cid:part23.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=100 align=left
border=0></A><A
href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0595228119/qid=1025648466/ref=sr_11_0_1/103-2518112-3866267">
<B>1. ROAMING THE WASTELANDS</B></A> <BR>(ISBN: 0-595-22811-9)
<P><B>NEW! JUST RELEASED! H. Millard’s latest sacred cow toppling
book,</B> <BR><B>is now available at Amazon.com <A
href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0595228119/qid=1025648466/ref=sr_11_0_1/103-2518112-3866267">by
clicking on the following link </A></B> <BR><B>or by calling
1-877-823-9235.</B>
<P><B>“A fun–and sobering–thing to read” Alamance
Independent </B></P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="90%" border=0>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR vAlign=top align=left>
<TD bgColor=#fef7de><A
href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0595194249/qid=999302752/sr=1-1/ref=sc_b_1/102-2975672-5124121"><IMG
height=150 alt="The Outsider"
src="cid:part24.3D7C872D.97A4400@earthlink.net" width=100 align=left
border=0></A>
<P><B><A
href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0595194249/qid=99930 2752/sr=1-1/ref=sc_b_1/102-2975672-5124121">2.
THE OUTSIDER</A></B> <BR>(ISBN: 0-595-19424-9) <BR><B>H. Millard’s
underground classic story of alienation</B> <BR><B>is available at
Amazon.com <A
href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0595194249/qid=99930 2752/sr=1-1/ref=sc_b_1/102-2975672-5124121">by
clicking on the following link </A></B> <BR><B>or by calling
1-877-823-9235: </B>
<P>"Millard is an important writer" - <I>New Nation News Reader</I>
<BR>"Millard is an original. His books aren't like your typical fiction.
If you don't know where to put his books, try the same shelf with
Kerouac, Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche" <I>- a
reader. </I></P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR> <BR>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="90%" border=0>
<CAPTION>
<TBODY><BR></TBODY></CAPTION>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD>
<UL>
<LI><B>References: </B><FONT color=#0000ff>(Note: links may expire and
content not necessary endorsed by H. Millard </FONT> <BR><FONT
color=#0000ff>or New Nation News but presented for further study for
those interested in the topic by the NNN editor.)</FONT>
<LI><A
href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=%22not%20racist%22">"Not
racist" links</A>
<LI><A
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/race/story/0,11374,761646,00.html">Monkey
chants as black man died 'not racist' </A>
<LI><A
href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22racial%20differences%22&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8">"racial
differences"</A>
<LI><A
href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=%22racial%20types%22&sa=N&tab=iw">"racial
types"</A>
<LI><A
href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=%22right%20to%20be%20white%22">"right
to be White"</A>
</LI></UL></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BODY></HTML>
Send comments to us at
archive@iubio.bio.indiana.edu
