<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>I understand that my use of the "M"-word is 'offensive'.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>If anyone can give me a better word to use for "an innocent life ended
prematurely by others", I'll use it.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>It cannot be that killing is 'accepted' because pre-existing
'judicial' practice allowed such to occur with impunity.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Everything changed when DNA evidence, and its discerning capacities, were
made available by Science.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The tragedy that's gone unspoken is, how many Innocents perished before DNA
evidence became available?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>This stuff constitutes a brutally-explicit example of the way
long-enduring, merely-familiar stuff gains inertia within nervous systems,
leaving folks so 'blinded' by the 'routine' that even calling it what it is
is deemed to be "offensive".</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>All around, the same-stuff ravages Humanity. Folks avert their eyes?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>k. p. collins</DIV></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Kenneth Collins" <<A
href="mailto:k.p.collins@worldnet.att.net_NOSPAM">k.p.collins@worldnet.att.net_NOSPAM</A>>
wrote in message <A
href="news:RLr6a.48994$rq4.4055280@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net">news:RLr6a.48994$rq4.4055280@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Here is a Column and an article from today's
<EM>New York Times</EM>, both of which directly expose the way in which
prejudice toward that which is merely familiar 'strives'. 'blindly' and
automatically, to act in ways that 'deny' Truth. What's discussed in the
Column and article is the way that 'blind' TD E/I-minimization 'takes on a
life of its own', becoming the 'determining' thing, with the result that
individuals who give themselves over to the dictates of
information-processing-'cheap' TD E/I-minimization, themselves, become the
primary Offense.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>The Column discusses the Offense inherent in
active pursuit of 'denial' of The Constitution of The United States of
America, in which TD E/I-minimization within individuals' nervous systems is
tacitly deemed to 'supercede' The Constitution.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>The article discusses the Offense of Murder
being advocated in the name of TD E/I-minimization within prosecutors' nervous
systems.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I recommend this atricle to all. It's
relatively-short, but it's even-handed exposing of Truth merits a
Pulitzer.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Both the Column and the article go directly to
the heart of the most important question that confronts Humanity: Will we
Citizens of Humanity use our innate capacities to Think, or shall we subjugate
our Beings to the dictates of merely-familiar a priori-TD E/I-minimized
'prescriptions'?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>In his or her answer to this question, each
person casts her/his 'vote' with respect to what will, or will not, be the
Survival of Humanity.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I cast my Vote:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Let us Choose to Think</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Further comments below.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>"<FONT color=#0000ff>Looking Back at an Ugly
Time</FONT>", By <FONT color=#ff0000><STRONG>BOB
HERBERT</STRONG></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><A
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/24/opinion/24HERB.html">http://<STRONG><FONT
color=#ff0000>www.nytimes.com</FONT></STRONG>/2003/02/24/opinion/24HERB.html</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>"<FONT color=#0000ff>An unchallenged
right-wing war against the very idea of diversity will turn us back in the
direction of the noxious beliefs spewed out by National Review in
1957.</FONT>"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Furthermore, any stance against Affirmative
action is, as I demonstrated in my open letter to President Bush,
Unconstitutional.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>"<FONT color=#0000ff>Prosecutors See Limits to
Doubt in Capital Cases</FONT>", <FONT color=#ff0000><STRONG>By ADAM
LIPTAK</STRONG></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><A
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/24/national/24DNA.html">http://<FONT
color=#ff0000><STRONG>www.nytimes.com</STRONG></FONT>/2003/02/24/national/24DNA.html</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>"<FONT color=#0000ff>A prosecutor was trying
to block a death row inmate from having his conviction reopened on the basis
of new evidence, and Judge Stith, of the Missouri Supreme Court, was getting
exasperated. `Are you suggesting,` she asked the prosecutor, that "even if we
find Mr. Amrine is actually innocent, he should be
executed?'</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#0000ff>Frank A. Jung, an
assistant state attorney general, replied, `That's correct, your
honor.`</FONT>"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>'Subjugation' of Truth to 'blindly'-automated
TD E/I-minimization.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>[...]</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#0000ff>"After a trial and appeal,
many prosecutors say, new evidence of claimed innocence should generally not
be considered by the courts.</FONT>"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>'Subjugation' of Truth to 'blindly'-automated
TD E/I-minimization.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>[...]</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#0000ff>"Jeremiah W. Nixon,
Missouri's attorney general, said Mr. Jung's response to Judge Stith was a
legally correct answer to an inflammatory hypothetical question. The point Mr.
Jung was trying to make, he said, is that there must come a time when cases
can be closed.</FONT>"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>'Subjugation' of Truth to 'blindly'-automated
TD E/I-minimization.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Clearly, the 'law', itself, is Murderer, and we all have Obligation,
under The Constitution of The United States of America, to bring the 'law',
itself, 'to trial'.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>All persons, vested, by the Citizenry, with Sworn Obligation to write The
:aw, are Impeachable if they fail to imbue The Law with Truth.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>K. P. Collins</DIV></FONT><BR><FONT color=#000000 size=2>-- <BR>"P. S.
..."</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
Send comments to us at
archive@iubio.bio.indiana.edu
