(none)

farishg at CC4.ADAMS.EDU farishg at CC4.ADAMS.EDU
Wed May 15 13:15:21 EST 1996


>From farishg Wed May 15 12:26:20 0600 1996 remote from cc4.adams.edu
Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 12:26:20 -0600 (MDT)
From: Guy Farish <farishg at cc4.adams.edu>
To: plant-ed at net.bio.net
Subject: Seminar
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960515121718.10951C-100000 at cc4.adams.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from cc4.adams.edu by cc4.adams.edu; Wed, 15 May 1996 12:26 MDT
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 1309

David,

I just finished my second time at teaching such a seminar course.  Most 
of my students did not use the web extensively, but a couple of them 
did.  One was a very good student who used it to find information on his 
topic, and also used a variety of more traditional sources (some of which 
he may have found through the web).  Another student, not nearly as 
strong academically, got all of her information from web pages.  I warned 
her midway through the semester that she needed to use the library as 
well, but apparently that was too much like work, and she didn't do it.  
While she found a lot of valuable information, much of it lacked depth or 
rigor commonly found in refereed journals.  

I think that is the greatest danger of this type of research.  It seems 
like playing, and thus might be more fun.  But I think students are wowed 
by the graphics and slick presentation, and don't get at the content that 
they need.  It's also hard to cite, and for those without web access it's 
hard to get to the same information to follow up.

Just some thoughts based on my experience.  If it can be used in 
conjunction with other resources, I think it's great, but some pitfalls 
exist.

Guy Farish
Biology Department
Adams State College
Alamosa, CO 81102
(719) 589-7969 FAX (719) 589-7242




More information about the Plant-ed mailing list