Compositae vs. Asteraceae ??
douglas.jensen at converse.edu
Wed Aug 8 10:51:31 EST 2001
As I understand it, the code allows 8 of the old descriptive family names to
be used as fully acceptable alternatives to their modern synonyms.
Palmae=Arecaceae (Although the pronounciation is similar to Ericaceae, the
families are very different. Nevertheless, pronounciation is not
Guttiferae=Hypericaceae/Clusiaceae (I don't know if anyone uses this
These are some of the most readily recognisable families in the world, they
are very large, and their descriptive names point out the specific traits
that many people use to identify them on sight. I teach both names to my
students, because both are useful.
From: Cereoid* [mailto:cereoid at prodigy.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 8:19 PM
To: plant-ed at hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Compositae vs. Asteraceae ??
The phrase "except in specified cases." in Principle IV refers to conserved
names not the eight obsolete Jussieu family names.
The family names Arecaceae and Ericaceae are neither homonyms nor are the
pronounced the same.
"Donna I. Ford-Werntz" <diford at wvnvm.wvnet.edu> wrote in message
> I'm with Bryan on this one (as I previously replied privately with the
> answer). The Asteraceae/Compositae duality is one of eight families that
> qualify under the Principle IV exclusion "except in specified cases."
> However, it is true that in many cases the older name is falling into
> disuse. One that will be long-standing I believe is Palmae rather than
> Arecaceae (vs. Ericaceae).
> Donna I. Ford-Werntz West Virginia Univ.
> Herbarium Curator (WVA) Box 6057
> Assoc. Prof. Biol. Morgantown, WV 26506
> 425 Brooks Hall (304)293-5201 X2549
> email: diford at wvu.edu fax: (304)293-6363
> Web site at http://www.as.wvu.edu/biology/
More information about the Plant-ed