someone at somewhere.com
Mon Sep 27 05:53:10 EST 2004
> Has it become acceptable in teaching to just fit a curve to data points
> and not report a correlation coefficient to indicate how well the curve
> fits? American Biology Teacher author Stanley Rice seems to think so and
> justifies his position because "most classes taught by readers of this
> journal would not be prepared for these analyses." ABT 66: 475.
> A correlation coefficient seems like a simple enough concept even for
> students with little knowledge of statitics. Why bother to fit a curve
> to the data if there is no indication of how well it fits?
It's not like "they" are fitting a curve to data points by eye. They are
obviously using a program to fit the curve, and therefore some sort of
algorithm is used to make sure the best fit is made.
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10/09/2004
More information about the Plant-ed