Methanol and improved yields

Lawrence London Lawrence.London at
Fri Oct 30 21:00:26 EST 1992

In article <1992Oct30.161544.12654 at> Thomas Bjorkman <Thomas_Bjorkman at> writes:
>In article <1992Oct23.022535.17164 at> Larry London,
>london at calypso.uucp writes:
>>In article <1992Oct20.141824.7870 at> klier at
>>>CO2.  I haven't seen the original paper (just the blurb in Sci News)-
>I have just read the original article in PNAS.  I am surprised at how
>little it adds to the LA Times clipping I read about it.
>The gist is that under conditions when photorespiration occurs, methanol
>helps.  Normally Rubisco, the enzyme responsible for fixing carbon
>dioxide also fixes a certain amount of oxygen creating products that take
>energy to get back to the starting point.  That is wasteful.  What they
>speculate the following:  methanol will bind the enzyme in place of
>oxygen.  The result is photosynthesis  by CO2 fixation and also methanol
>fixation but no photorespiration.
>One curious thing:  Andy Benson knows photosynthesis like nobody's
>business.  In fact the biochemical pathway of photosynthesis is called
>the Calvin-Benson cycle.  So why didn't they measure the biochemistry of
>methanol fixation since at least one of the authors is as good as anybody
>at figuring out the biochemistry?
>Along more practical lines, it seems that the increased turgor is caused
>by the higher photosynthesis making more sugar in the "noonday sun", so
>that there is more osmotic pressure and thus turgor.  Sounds OK, but
>there are not direct data.
>Getting even more practical...
>If you are growing tomatoes or watermelons in the Arizona summer you have
>to water.  From a resource use standpoint, you can apparently cut down on
>water use by spraying methanol which is a benefit.  It also seems that it
>is beneficial from an energy standpoint in that the energy value of the
>methanol that is sprayed on the plants is likely to be less than the
>energy required to pump the extra water.
>Now about those explosions:  for most of the tender-leaved vegetables,
>10-15% methanol in water was about right.  That is not going to burn.  As
>with _any_ spray material, it is appropriate to wear a mask to keep it
>out of your lungs (this even applies with water), and to spray when there
>is no wind.
>In summary, this is pretty weird stuff, but there is some plausibility. 
>If it is right, there should be some benefits, but it is hardly a
>panacea.  It really reminds me of another genius with some way-out
>ideas...Linus Pauling and Vitamin C. 
>Thomas Bjorkman
>Horticultural Sciences Department
>Cornell University
>Thomas_Bjorkman at

   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet: or

More information about the Plantbio mailing list