CONGRESS is the PROBLEM! Was Re: Stupid Americans Re: HOORAY for Surg

[Jim I. Walker]

Article 127852 of alt.drugs:
>Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs,sci.med.pharmacy,bionet.plants,alt.wired,alt.society.generation-x,alt.psychoactives,alt.hemp,alt.flame,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.drugs,alt.conspiracy
Path: usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!tilde.csc.ti.com!cauldron!ra.csc.ti.com!usenet
From: mns1 at lobby.ti.com
Subject: Re: CONGRESS is the PROBLEM! Was Re: Stupid Americans Re: HOORAY for Surg 
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Message-ID: <CI1Fs3.29K at csc.ti.com>
Sender: usenet at csc.ti.com
Nntp-Posting-Host: howard.rtc.sc.ti.com
Organization: Texas Instruments
References: <kh22xou00WBO4EjYls at andrew.cmu.edu>
   <kodak.755555018 at mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <1993Dec14.110115.20711 at cobra.uni.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1993 20:33:49 GMT
Lines: 25
Xref: usenet.ins.cwru.edu talk.politics.drugs:18768 sci.med.pharmacy:1038 bionet.plants:2293 alt.wired:2286 alt.society.generation-x:4420 alt.psychoactives:4252 alt.hemp:2077 alt.flame:102228 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:58464 alt.drugs:64734 alt.conspiracy:38900


In article <1993Dec14.110115.20711 at cobra.uni.edu>, <hussm9504 at cobra.uni.edu> 
writes:
  
>         If you think cyberspace is a place where we can talk 
> about whatever we want, think again.  It will only be a matter 
> of time before someone does an "expose" on the availibility of 
> porn and the violence of MUDs.  They will mention that people 
> discuss abortion, racsism, communism, and rebelling against 
> Congress.  It will take less than a month and the US side of the 
> INTERNET will be regulated (instead of just being monitored by 
> the CIA and NSA and ever other spook group).  They will attempt 
> to ban groups and sites and force us to voluntarily rate our posts 
> (this one is approved for those aged 18 and over, unless it discusses
> masturbation in which case it is banned.).

I'm afraid Mr. Huss is right.

All you anti-2nd Ammendment nuts, take note -- the Bill of Rights is
a package, not an itemization.  If we continue to allow the Congress
to urinate on the 2nd, 4th, 5th, 9th and 10th Ammendments, can the 
1st be safe?

---
Mark Shaw
********************
********************



Hmmm... Isn't it strange that after the Bill Of Rights, the amendments
that followed often resembled bills *against* rights?