is this group ill?

[G. Ng]

In article <1993Feb5.001322.18079 at cbfsb.cb.att.com> djd at cbnewsg.cb.att.com (david.j.daulton) writes:
>Newsgroup ill?  No, but I think some of us are a bit intimidated.
>Most of my garden questions go to "rec.gardens" (and I see Kay
>...
>I suspect there are many out there who read rec.gardens and
>this group too, and hold back a bit here.  True?

Although I'm not entirely certain of the original charter of bionet.plants,
wasn't it created for discussion on more botany, research-oriented
questions rather than horticultural issues, which I think rec.gardens is for?
-- 
george ng
univ. of toronto undergraduate
molecular plant biology/botany