is this group ill?
ajt at rri.sari.ac.uk
Mon Feb 15 18:56:40 EST 1993
Una Smith (smith-una at edu.yale) wrote:
: ajt at rri.sari.ac.uk writes:
: >According to the arbitron summary posted recently by Una Smith in
: >bionet.general 175 people were caught actually reading bionet.plants
: >out of an estimated 6600 who are suspected of doing so:
: First off, I'd say ignore the estimated total readership. For various
: reasons it is likely to be way off. The arbitron system reports data
I thought the sarcastic tone of my message was self-evident, Una ;-(
Yes, I agree arbitron results are misleading: but you posted them and I
simply quoted what was of interest to this group. I read this group by
email and I'm sure I am not alone ...
What was your intention in posting the arbitron ratings to
bionet.general and then demolishing my (light hearted) use of them?
Dr. A.J.Travis, | JANET: <ajt at uk.ac.sari.rri>
Rowett Research Institute, | other: <ajt at rri.sari.ac.uk>
Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, | phone: +44 (0)224 712751
Aberdeen, AB2 9SB. UK. | fax: +44 (0)224 715349
More information about the Plantbio