DNA methylation sites
Andrew Hobbs
andrewh at uniwa.uwa.edu.au
Tue May 11 04:18:08 EST 1993
Brian H. Taylor (BRIAN at BIO.TAMU.EDU) wrote:
:
: I'm wondering if anyone has ever ruled out cytosine methylation at
: GC dinucleotides (as opposed to CG and CXG) or, for that matter,
: CXXG. I'm familiar with the Gruenbaum et al. Nature paper from 1981
: (Vol. 292, 860-862), where nearest neighbor analysis was used to show
: a high level of methylation at CG and CXG. One nonsymmetrical
: arrangement, CAT, was tested and was found to be <4% methylated, but
: I don't know if that means it was below their limits of detection or
: they could see almost 4% methylation at those sites. I don't think
: their approach would have tested for GC symmetry. The reason I am
: asking is that I occasionally encounter cases of possible incomplete
: digestion of restriction sites in genomic plant DNA with enzymes
: like HindIII (recognition sequence AAGCTT). This should not be
: methylated by the usual rules, but if either GC or CXXG methylation
: occurs it would block digestion. Appropriate controls indicate that
: I don't have a problem with dirty DNA or bad enzyme or any of the
: usual trivial explanations. Any additional information on
: alternative methlation sites will be appreciated.
:
:
:
:
:
: Brian H. Taylor * Ad hoc loc and
: Dept. of Biology, Texas A&M University * quid pro quo,
: College Station, TX 77843-3258 * so little time,
: * so much to know!
: Phone: (409) 845-7754 *
: FAX: (409) 845-2891 * Jeremy Hilary Boob
: * (The Nowhere Man)
What you are finding is typical for plant DNA. Methylation of Cytosines
can reach close to 100% in plant genomic DNA. (Not just in CG
dinucleotides). Hence when using restriction enzymes to digest plant
DNA it is best to avoid enzymes which are inhibited by methyl-C at any
position in their recognition site.
Andrew Hobbs
Dept of Biochemistry
University of Western Australia
andrewh at uniwa.uwa.edu.au
More information about the Plantbio
mailing list