newsgroup for cacti?
cereoid at prodigy.net
Mon Nov 5 17:47:16 EST 2001
Can you read Bruno (Psycho Cactus)?
You have yet to justify the need for an unnecessary newsgroup.
If you reply is an example of what to expect, I am against it.
Are you a subscriber to Cacti_etc? If you are, you've been nothing more than
a lurker, not an active participant at all. So why bother starting another
group in which you won't participate?
Cacti_etc is already an easily accessible mailing list and includes
caudiciforms (fat plants). Its just not a newsgroup. Aren't you already a
subscriber? You should be if you expect to be up-to-date in what's going on
in the world of succulent plants.
Psycho Cactus <brunoplamondon at home.com> wrote in message
news:3BE705AA.797B5B3 at home.com...
> Yes, my original post was crossposted to reach most people that could be
> Do you know how to read ?
> Look at the single line between the paragraphs.
> Form the original post:
> This is a request for discussion, not a call for votes. In this
> phase of the process, any potential problems with the proposed
> newsgroups should be raised and resolved. The discussion period will
> continue for a minimum of 21 days (starting from when the first RFD
> for this proposal is posted to news.announce.newgroups), after which
> a Call For Votes (CFV) will be posted by a neutral vote taker.
> Please do not attempt to vote until this happens.
> All discussion of this proposal should be posted to news.groups.
> This RFD attempts to comply fully with the Usenet newsgroup creation
> guidelines outlined in "How to Create a New Usenet Newsgroup" and
> "How to Format and Submit a New Group Proposal". Please refer to
> these documents (available in news.announce.newgroups) if you have
> any questions about the process.
> END PROCEDURE.
> Cereoid* wrote:
> > Not true if you reply to all the newsgroups listed above.
> > Your original posting was cross posted, Bruno.
More information about the Plantbio