His-tagged protein won't stick to Ni column
klenchin at facstaff.wisc.edu
klenchin at facstaff.wisc.edu
Wed Nov 20 16:18:13 EST 1996
In article <3293705D.74E9 at LMB.uni-muenchen.de>,
Boris Steipe <steipe at LMB.uni-muenchen.de> wrote:
->>
->> Yeah, and pick up all those proteins that bind to chelated Zn and Cu,
->> but do not bind to Ni (FYI, Ni is much more specific for His, while
other
->> divalents bind other aromatics as well).
->>
->> - Dima
->
->Pharmacia and Qiagen material are not the same: Pharmacia sells
->Iminodiacetic acid (IDA) and Quiagen sells Nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA).
->We once checked and found that Zinc would work somewhat better with IDA
->and Nickel somewhat better with NTA. The differences were not dramatic
->though. Check Lindner et al. (1992) Methods 4:41-56.
Sure. Other things being the same, IDA is less specific for His than NTA.
The difference is not dramatic only in one case - when working
with well-behaving His-tagged proteins that bind at high imidazole
concentration (~> 20 mM).
When it comes to purification of non-tagged protein, Ni-NTA is the
combination that binds lowest proportion of "total protein" form
crude extracts.
- Dima
More information about the Proteins
mailing list