histag elution alternative
Frank Fuerst
ffrank at rz.uni-potsdam.de
Thu Nov 2 10:27:58 EST 2000
"Richard P. Grant" <rpg14 at yahoo.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>In article <8tq8il$8nq$1 at news.doit.wisc.edu>,
>klenchin at facstaff.REMOVE_TO_REPLY.wisc.edu (Dima Klenchin) wrote:
>
>> The nickel is gone. We are talking about _recharging_ and that
>> necessarily implies stripping the original, fully or partially reduced,
>
>From Cornelius' posting, that's not that crystal clear. I'm not sure
>whether he reduced it in the nickel-bound state or not.
I would even say that it _is_ clear that the nickel was still there.
The original poster wanted an alternative for imidazole as an eluent,
and asked wether EDTA or DTT would work:
>We now want to turn to an alternative elution
>approach e.g. EDTA. [...]
>
>I have also been thinking about whether one could
>use high concentrations of DTT. In the manual
>(Quiaexpressionist) they write that DTT can reduce
>Nickel thereby preventing nickel from binding His-tagged
>proteins.
And Cornelius warned him to use DTT.
Bye, Frank
--
In de.admin.news.announce gibt es jetzt die Wahlscheine für
die Abstimmung über die Einrichtung einer Samba-Newsgruppe.
Wer sich für Windows-Unix(Linux)-Vernetzung interessiert,
sollte mit abstimmen!
More information about the Proteins
mailing list