sequence's ends -- crucial to protein folding too?

Artem Evdokimov AEVDOKIMOZ at cinci.rr.com
Thu Sep 19 19:50:55 EST 2002


> > Cutting/adding/mutating residues at the termini is VERY OFTEN bad for
the
> > folding. Keep in mind that oftentimes having extra residues is bad
> > too.
>
> I would have argued that this is rather a question of solubility,
> i.e. "sticky ends" of a protein aggregate? Can you give some examples?

Sorry, but no :) These proteins are related to my current proprietary work
and I can't disclose them without risking to be fired. I would agree that in
many cases the problem lies in the solubility, but not always. Specifically,
when you're truncating a transmembrane domain from a cytosolic catalytic
domain, there is a significant risk of misfolding if the cut is not
accurate. I wish I could really share the examples, but I can't.


> Hm. If you don't cut enough, you get loose termini, which don't
> interfere with folding (because this is the near-native sequence), but
> inhibit crystallization. If you cut too much, you get a problem because
> you cut beyond the "terminus" and deleted a residue that is in the bulk
> of the structure. That's how I see it..

This makes sense, however let's not forget other likely (parallel)
scenarios: imagine that you have left a few extra hydrophobic (or
mixed-type) residues at the N-terminus - chances are that they will tend to
aggregate and assume non-native conformations shortly after their emergence
from the ribosome. This can create a 'nucleus of misfolding' if you wish,
which will drag the rest of the sequence into a free energy hole from which
it may never climb out. With the C-terminal residues, the situation is not
as severe but there are still possible problems with sequences that do not
fold spontaneously and require chaperonins and related molecules.

Best regards,

A.G.E.





More information about the Proteins mailing list