Hot Zone "errors"
Angelika M Longacre
longacre at selway.umt.edu
Tue Feb 14 17:14:42 EST 1995
First off, let me make clear that I am stealing time on my wife's login.
Next, I am an English major exiled to work in technology. Those things
in mind, my problem with "The Hot Zone" is that it is very poorly
written. Any time the author had a chance to throw in some half-baked
literary allusion, he did---a case in point is scientists on a boat
sailing into a "heart of darkness." What a gas, the guy must have read
Conrad, or maybe watched "Apocalypse Now". He writes like a
first year English Lit major doing Work Study in the Biology department.
As for the science, when one victim "crashes and bleeds out"
the author refers to the virus pouring out of the guy looking for another
victim---is that good science or simply a pathetic fallacy? Do viruses
"look" for victims?
Another example of shoddy work happens after the author, whose name,
bless God, has escaped me, tells the story of the woman going to work in
her space suit, cutting through her gloves and exposing herself to Ebola,
then maybe a hundred pages later suggests that the woman is sought out
because it's well known how good she is in a suit. Yeah, right. I'm not
saying that the actual people involved weren't good, I'm simply saying
that this author didn't spend enough time at the desk with this "novel."
Maybe the blame rests with the guy's editors, who surely should have
gone through the book with greater care. Some of the sentences run to
great length without any point, others are thrown together in a haphazard
attempt to create "mood." A little trimming could have produced a much
stronger work. As it is, "The Hot Zone" represents a weak real-life
cousin to "The Andromeda Strain." I'd rather read scientific articles on
the subject than bad science "realism."
More information about the Virology