short postdocs - truth or dare
Sarah L. Pallas
spallas at bcm.tmc.edu
Thu Aug 29 20:03:15 EST 1996
In article <199608281851.LAA32140 at rho.ben2.ucla.edu> Megan,
megan at ucla.edu writes:
>lined up for after June). She is wondering if it is wise to tell the PI
>with whom she is interviewing that it will likely be a relatively short
>postdoc (she guesses about a year) when she interviews, when she starts,
>when she is looking for the next one. Basically she doesnt want her new
>to be disappointed or upset if she leaves in a year, but also doesnt
>hurt her chances of getting the position. Any suggestions??
I have been on both sides of this issue. I looked into short postdocs
and was totally truthful to the PI about it, and I got several offers.
In the end, my husband and I decided to be apart for a year (with
frequent visits between Cornell and MIT) rather than waste time on a
short postdoc. You can't really get much done in a year, and it could
revitalize a relationship to have some time apart (could also do the
opposite, you have to judge).
On the other side, if someone wanted me to hire them on as a postdoc and
then left unexpectedly after a year I would be very angry, especially if
I was supplying the salary for that person and spending my valuable time
training them. I expect to see some benefit from my investment. Funds
for postdoc salaries are hard to come by, especially for young
investigators like myself. If I knew the person would only be there for
a year, and I thought they would be able to hit the ground running, I
might be able to tailor a short project to them.
Sarah Pallas, Ph.D.
More information about the Womenbio