Tenure...Chronicle story about tenure?
linden at MAIL.UTEXAS.EDU
Mon Dec 23 16:30:29 EST 1996
><Pine.A41.3.95b.961221143630.29674A-100000 at dante15.u.washington.edu>,
>Sarah Boomer <sarai at u.washington.edu> wrote:
>> Anyway - I'd like to see a little discussion of this issue because
>> I am, frankly, of the opinion that tenure isn't really promoting the
>> appropriate people and seems to create a lot of deadwood in the system. I
>> would personally like to see it dismantled for those reasons. [snip]
>So how long ago was tenure designed? Until how recently was it necessary
>to protect people? How is it defended in debate now?
As a non-tenured person in a non-tenture track position, I may not be able
to shed a lot of light on this question, but I can shed a little. Tenure
as we know it was instituted in the McCarthy era - quite a frightening time
to be teaching "unpopular" subjects such as modern economics, I'm told.
And, living in a state where the legislature is on one hand trying to
abandon tenure and on the other has a lot of power over teaching loads, and
a lot of misunderstandings about how & what gets taught (the evolution
debates still rage in Texas!), it is just a bit disturbing to think of
tenure ceasing to exist.
Perhaps I might propose an alternative I saw in place in Mexico: people
get tenure, but they receive only a certain salary for being in a tenured
position. Above this salary, "bonuses" that make living in Mexico City
tolerable (as much as it ever is;) are added for: teaching undergraduates;
teaching graduates (these both are thesis degrees), publications (weighted
by citation rate!). It works in that the "dead wood" cannot really live on
the base salary & take off, leaving the lines free to be filled with
hopefully more productive people. Of whom, I might add, a significant
(and, to me, initially surprising) number are women with children!
Linden Higgins, Ph.D.
Dept. of Zoology,
University of Texas at Austin
Austin, TX 78712
linden at mail.utexas.edu
More information about the Womenbio