women-in-science

[Ms. S.J. Rickard]

> I had a similar thought to Sarah Rickard's. 
> What are the implications of being under the bionet umbrella?
> I certainly don't think i've seen much subject material that would be
> opaque to non-biologists.
> 
> I guess it could be argued that the name doesn't matter too much. But
> it would be good if people felt sure that they could ask about stuff
> not directly related to biology.

I also think it would attract new people who at present don't bother 
subscribing as they think it's biology only.
Sarah