dr._margaret_martens at FTDETRCK-CCMAIL.ARMY.MIL dr._margaret_martens at FTDETRCK-CCMAIL.ARMY.MIL
Wed Jan 10 14:49:42 EST 1996

     I subscribe to a number of the biosci newsgroups by e-mail.  The way I 
     keep them separate is to have my e-mail software (Lotus' CC-Mail) 
     automatically sort them into folders by newsgroup.  You are correct 
     that the "FROM:" address is the sender, not the newsgroup, but if you 
     look at the "TO:" address it is, at least on my system, the address of 
     the newsgroup.  I have my software look for this address when it 
     sorts.  CC-Mail is a fairly sophisticated software package, and yours 
     may not have this capability, but it is worth a try.  It has certainly 
     helped me in the battle against e-mail chaos. :-)
     Good Luck,

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: unsubscribe
Author:  jjoy at nas.edu ("Janet Joy") at Internet-Mail
Date:    1/7/96 11:11

  Someone, I forget who because I deleted the message too soon (oops), 
  asked me why I wanted to unsubscribe and urged me to stay on a little 
  longer.  The reason I feel a need to unsubscribe is mostly the format. 
  Messages I receive from this group are identified by sender and not as 
  "womenbio".  This may seem unimportant, but since I receive often 20 
  emails a day, many from people I don't know but must respond to asap, 
  dealing w/ my email takes a lot of time.  Many times I can't afford the 
  time to read the posts from the 4 listgroups to which I subscribe.  If I 
  can't delete them all en masse or file them for later reading it just 
  gets too burdensome.  I've followed this discussion group for the past 4 
  weeks or so and have found few posts of interest.  I'm very interested in 
  career issues of young women scientists and happy to offer suggestions 
  (having spent 15 years as a research scientist myself--now working in 
  science policy).  However, I just don't have time to follow this group. 
  If it were structured so that messages were identified by group (not 
  sender), readers could be spared the necessity of choosing not to read 
  non-work related mail.   This is how every other group to which I 
  subscribe is structured (i.e. YSN, ecol-econ, wisenet). Could womenbio be 
  set up this way?   As it is, I've had to check all these messages--and I 
  do find some of them unnecessarily acrimonious and unconstructive. 
  However, if time were not a problem for me I would stay on.   So, my 
  unsubscribing is not so much disinterest or annoyance, but simply a time 
  management problem due to the way it's set up.
  Janet Joy

More information about the Womenbio mailing list