S L Forsburg wrote:
>> Check out the latest Nature (23 May 97 issue). There's a commentary
> called "nepotism and sexism in peer review" about a study done in
> Sweden on peer review for postdoc fellowships, which suggests
> that women candidates must be substantially better than the men to
> get an equivalent rating.
>> What's sad of course is that Sweden is supposed to be enlightened
> about equality between men and women; if they see evidence for
> gender bias there, what's it like elsewhere?
I'm right here with you, I'm cross-posting my own alerts about
this study in soc.feminism and all the major science groups.
I think we should call for an investigation of the NSF right
away. I'm very serious about this. Peer review decisions are
often life-altering decisions, women are having their entire lives
rearranged and deformed by this system.
Last week's _Economist_ was wonderful here - they publicized
the Swedish study with a full-page article under the
for which I love them. :-)
Let's all call our Senators and Congresswomen and -men and
turn up the heat on the NSF to open themselves up to
rigorous analysis of bias in peer review.
I foresee class action lawsuits here.
To work that hard, to sacrifice your life to the research track,
and then get screwed by a team of irresponsible and under-accountable
"peers" injecting their personal feelings about women into
supposedly objective judgments about the allocation of PUBLIC
We need the facts about American peer review now.