IUBio Biosequences .. Software .. Molbio soft .. Network News .. FTP

grant distribution

S L Forsburg forsburg at nospamsalk.edu
Fri Jun 27 15:35:07 EST 1997

bmartin at utmem1.utmem.edu wrote

> Consider the argument that soft-money institutions need to put-up or
> shut-up. If the institution is not willing to support the research
> effort, should the government or other funding agencies cover the
> entire
> cost?

Indeed, but where does the money come from?  That's the question.
At a university with undergraduates, there is tuition.  At
a state university, there is state funding.  Even at a medical
school, there is  clinical income.   But (unlike Harvard)
a place like Salk has no endowment to speak of, no taxpayers, no
patients,  and no tuition.  Where is the money to pay salaries?

One might argue that at such a place, where the faculty
spends all their time on science and none on teaching, that
the taxpayer is getting their money's worth. What's the difference
with the NIH paying a university professor his 3months summer
salary for the fulltime work he does in the lab over the 
summer break from teaching, and paying a soft-money person 100%, 
since he spends all his time in the lab all year?

DON'T REPLY to the email address in header.
It's an anti-spam.  Use the one below.
S L Forsburg, PhD  forsburg at salk.edu
Molecular Biology and Virology Lab          
The Salk Institute, La Jolla CA 
"These are my opinions.  I don't have  
time to speak for anyone else."

More information about the Womenbio mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net