RE post of Questionnaire

Mary Ann Sesma msesma at zeus.bell.k12.ca.us
Tue Jun 30 23:40:36 EST 1998


If you have not completed the questionnaire would you be so kind as to do
so.  It will take just a few minutes of your time.  This first run is to
test the questionnaire.   Then we can proceed to the next step which is to
retrieve data from the selected universities.

Many thanks

Mary Ann




INTRODUCTION

I wish to thank all the collaborators--Megan Brown, Susan Forsburg and
others who wish to remain anonymous.  This is  a collective product effort.
and it has been reviewed by highly competent individuals.    The first ten
respondants ,regardless of university,  are to kindly asked to respond not
only to the questionnaire, but to add a brief statement of satisfaction or
comment at the end.  Should you prefer, a mac microsoft word v. 6.01 in rft
has been attached to this post.


The next steps:
1. Selection of the Universities: (those that been suggested)
	MIT, UCBerkeley, UCLA,Duke. Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison Campus,
University of Washington (St Louis), and University of Chicago.

2. If agreement can be reached on these universities, I will ask that a
Ph.D. alumnus of each university act as contact.  Additionally, I will
write the Dean of the Graduate School or other appropriate person , present
the Questionnaire, and ask for assistance in tracking the Ph.D.s in Biology
within  the years 1987-1992.Contact  will be made with the assistance of
the Ph.D. graduate contact person and by mail or e mail.  Megan Brown and I
will subsidize the snail mail cost.

3. The collaborators who drew up the survey, will perform the analysis,
write the presentation and publish.    Non electronic publication will be
sought.    Additionally the results will be posted on both the List and on
Susan' Launch Page.

We strongly urge all member of the list even if  they have not completed
the Ph.D, or are not a graduate of the specified universities to complete
the survey.   These responses (confidential) will be placed in a invididual
folder and analyzed separately and compared to the University results.
Please indicate that you are a member of the list communty at the top of
the questionnaire.   This questionnaire is designed to elicit rich and full
answers from both genders.  These answers will in many cases not agree with
the general statistical data from NSF.   Your answers potentially will
reveal the unique "culture" of science and the barriers that impact entry
and maintenance of careers/

WE NEED VOLUNTEERS TO MAKE THE UNIVERSITY CONTACTS!

Thanks in advance,

Mary Ann Sesma



Questionnaire

Career Decisions: A Snapshot Of Ph.D.s in Biology from three selected
Universities who received their degrees between 1987 and 1992

Purpose: To obtain data on the career choices made by recent biology Ph.D.s.

Authors: This survey is a joint effort among interested participants in a
Bionet USENET newsgroup. Lead author is Mary Ann Sesma. Ms. Sesma is a
Secondary Principal (retired). Other contributors include scientists at
several levels and of several occupations.

Results: Survey results may be published, and illustrative quotations from
individuals may be included (but will remain anonymous) The reasons "why"
behind the statistics provide a level of understanding that cannot be
obtained using numbers alone. All questionnaires will be confidential and
assigned random number codes for data compilation.

Directions: Copy the questionnaire with additional space as needed, answer,
and return to msesma at bell.k12.ca.us (preferred) or SESMA at aol.com.
Alternatively, please mail to Mary Ann Sesma at 1621 Sunnyhill Drive,
Monterey Park, CA 91754. Hard copy questionnaires will be made available
upon request by post card to Mrs. Sesma at the above address.

One word answers as in Y or N can be deleted to reflect your choice.
Questionnaire participants are urged to provide explanatory remarks
whenever they wish. Variable spaces are provided to allow room for your
answers. Feel free to expand your answers.

We urge you to respond. The questionnaire results will be most meaningful
if a diverse cross-section of Ph.D. recipients responds, not just those who
have been "successful" in their careers.

I. Demographics:  BOLD QUESTIONS WILL REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL EXCEPT FOR GENDER
AND CITIZENSHIP.

A. Name:

B. e mail address:

C. If you do not have an e mail address please provide an alternate mail
address

D. Gender:	M		F

E. Citizenship: 	U.S.		*Other (please specify)
___________________
*Citizenship may influence career choices

II. Graduate Education

A. Undergraduate to Graduate Transition
Did you go straight to Graduate School after receiving your undergraduate
degree?
	Y			N
Did you take time off before entering Graduate School ?
	Y			N
If you did not go straight to graduate school, how long was this period and
what  did you do during this time?
*SPACE*


Did "taking time off" impact your later career decisions or progress?
	Y			N
*SPACE*


B. Institution that granted the Ph.D.
	Name of institution:
	Department:

C. What year did you begin your Ph.D.?
	Year:

D. What year did you complete your Ph.D.?
	Year:

E. How old were you when you completed your Ph.D.?
	Age:


III. Post Doctoral Training
A. Did you do a postdoc(s)? 	Y				N
Total number of years _______

If you did more than one postdoc, please indicate the duration for each.
Postdoc 1:
Postdoc 2:
Postdoc 3:

B. Do Ph.D. recipients in your field usually do a postdoc?
	Y			N

C. If you did do a postdoc, did you take time off between graduate school
and postdoc?
	Y			N

If yes, did "taking time off" impact your later career decisions or progress?
	Y			N
*SPACE*


D. If you didn't do a postdoc, what influenced your decision?
*SPACE*


E. The phrase "pipeline" is often used to describe the long training period
scientists go through before they obtain a permanent position. Do you
consider yourself still in the "pipeline" as a postdoc or some other
position?
	Y			N
*SPACE FOR COMMENT*




IV. Your Current Career. Where Are You Now And How Did You Get There?
A. Your Current Career:
Job Title			Institution/Department
	#years at this position


B. Are you currently working in the specialty you trained in?
	Y			N

If not, what specialty are you working in?


C. When you accepted your current job, how many jobs had you applied for
and how many job offers did you have to choose from?


If desired, please comment on your job search.
*SPACE*




D. Individual career paths may vary. Not all Ph.D.s go directly from
graduate school or postdoc to their current position. What other
jobs/positions did you hold before your current position? For each
position, list job title, institution, and duration.
*SPACE*




E. Definition of Current Job.
Choose one of the following categories and subcategories that best
describes your primary effort (e.g. teaching, college; or research,
government lab). If you care to, describe further in the space below. If
you have multiple responsibilities, please rank them in responsibility,  if
possible: 1 highest to 5 lowest.

1) Teaching
	A. university (undergrad/grad)
	B. college (undergrad only)
	C. community college
	D. secondary
	E. other (please indicate) _________________

2) Research (academic)
	A. university (undergrad/grad)
	B. college  (undergrad only)
	C. research institute/nonprofit
	D. medical/graduate school (grad only)
	E. governmental labs
	F. other (please indicate) ____________

3) Research (industry)
	A. biotech
	B. pharma
	C. other (please indicate) ________________

4) Alternative Careers (science related)
e.g. science journalist, patent attorney, biotech/pharma manager (see below
for a more complete listing of examples)

5) Alternative Careers (non-science related)
e.g. community center coordinator, insurance claims adjustor, stay-at-home
parent, graphic artist, etc.
*SPACE*



F.. If you have had multiple jobs, which did you like most, or like least?
*SPACE FOR COMMENT*



G. Why did you select the career choice identified above?
*SPACE*





H. Did you consider other career choices?
	Y			N

If yes, what were they and what made you decide against them?
*SPACE*



I. Alternative Careers
For the purposes of this survey, science-related alternative careers are
defined as non-bench positions related to science and include many jobs,
including but not limited to: science journalists, patent attorneys,
consultants to financial institutions, science education specialists,
evaluators, high-school teachers, forensics, bioinformatics, public policy,
technology transfer, biotech/pharma positions in regulatory affairs,
clinical affairs, marketing, sales, technical support, manufacturing,
consultants etc.

Since entering graduate school, have you ever considered a science-related
alternative career?
	Y			N

If yes, which alternative careers were considered? Why did you or did you
not pursue them?
*SPACE*




There are also alternative jobs that are not related to science, such as
restaurant manager, hospital administrator, etc. Since entering graduate
school, have you ever considered an alternative career not related to
science?
	Y			N

If yes, what careers were considered? Why did you or did you not pursue them?
*SPACE*




V. Career Expectations and Reality

A. Is your current job the one you expected to have when you were a
graduate student?
	Y			N

If not, why not, and when did your career goals change?
*SPACE*




B. Would you recommend your current job/career to students?
	Y			N

Why or why not?
*SPACE *




C. Is your current job the one you want, i.e. are you now where you want to be?
	Y			N

What is your "dream job" and how close have you come to it?
*SPACE*




If your current position is not what you want, what obstacles are there
between you and the career/job you really want?
*SPACE*




D. If you could turn back the clock, would you again make the decision to
enter graduate school and get a Ph.D. in science?
	Y			N

Why or why not?
*SPACE*




E. Do you think you are fairly paid in your current position?
	Y			N

Please comment if you'd like.
*SPACE*



F. Do you think that you are fairly evaluated in your current position?
	Y			N

Please comment if you'd like.
*SPACE*



G. Would you consider going back to graduate school or college (or have you
already) to add another degree or licensure to your Ph.D.
	Y			N

If you answered yes, why? What would you choose?
*SPACE*




H. During graduate school, would you have liked the opportunity to have
dual curricular pathways. e.g. science and business?
	Y			N
*SPACE: Please Explain*





I. How do you perceive your professional future? Where do you see yourself
in 5 years? In 10 years? In 20 years?
*SPACE FOR COMMENT*




J. Would you have done anything differently in making your career choices?
	Y			N

Why or why not?
*SPACE FOR COMMENT*



K. Please comment, if you like, about opportunities in science careers.
*SPACE FOR COMMENT*




L. Do you believe that there should be changes in our policy of training
Ph.D.s and postdocs?
	Y			N

Why or why not and what changes, if any, should be made?
*SPACE FOR COMMENT*




M. What do you consider to be the greatest barriers for men and women for
entry into and maintenance of science careers?




In academe?





In industry?





In other science careers?






THANKS FOR YOUR INPUT.




Mary Ann Sesma                          e mail
1621 Sunnyhill Drive                    msesma at bell.k12.ca.us (preferred)
Monterey Park, CA 91754                 sesma at aol.com
phone; (213)261-5860
fax:(213)261-8692






More information about the Womenbio mailing list