johnk at spasm.niddk.nih.gov
Wed Nov 29 03:13:03 EST 1995
In article <4954kd$91i at mserv1.dl.ac.uk>, GERARD at XRAY.BMC.UU.SE (Gerard 'CD' Kleywegt) writes:
|> NOE violations, how accurate are those ? People who don't
|> fit buildup curves used to classify NOEs as short, medium
|> or long (fuzzy science ? ;-) when I was young (not sure
|> if they still do that, having joined "the other side").
The terms are "strong," "medium," and "weak." :-)
|> I would guess that errors don't build up in one direction,
|> but more or less compensate each other (you could find out
|> and see which one gives the best model (don't use procheck,
|> since that is heavily biased towards anything refined
|> against engh & & huber; also don't use noe violations
Huh? First you agree with me that the precise values of the
angles probably don't introduce significant errors in a
structures, and then you say that you shouldn't look at
PROCHECK because it's biased toward structures refined
with a particular (as well as accurate, and similar to
those values usually used in parallhdg) set of angles.
Which is it?
|> xtallography) - instead, use the ramachandran plot and
Again, that's the first page of PROCHECK's output.
|> vriend & sander's directional atomic contact analysis;
|> these check things not restrained in refinement and
|> are therefore good validation criteria; you could also
It's true that you need cross-validation terms, and that
individual NOEs are not as good as individual reflections,
but I don't think that the WHAT-IF "quality control" is
the best choice either. The best choice is to use your
own data--the proton chemical shifts. They're already
measured, they're very sensitive to the local environment,
and they're (fairly) well predicted from theory. You
could throw out a fraction of your 1H shifts (you are
refining against them directly, aren't you? :-) and
use that for cross-validation. Hmm--perhaps someone
should write a paper on that?
| |/ /
-- /\ // /--
|| || / /||
|| || / / ||
|| ||/ / ||
John Kuszewski || |/ /| ||
johnk at spasm.niddk.nih.gov || / /|| ||
\/ / / || \/
that's MISTER protein G to you! |/__/| |
"Biophysics has driven me to an attitude of apocalyptic doom"
More information about the X-plor