Axel T. Brunger
brunger at LAPLACE.CSB.YALE.EDU
Tue Sep 24 10:22:46 EST 1996
Did you use X-PLOR for anisotropic scaling? In X-PLOR(online), 3.843,
you can specify a subrange for computing the anisotropic tensor,
but apply the tensor to ALL reflections (file
JAMIER at rubens.its.unimelb.edu.au wrote:
> I have a few queries regarding anisotropic scaling of data.
> A data set was scaled anisotropically ( infinity to 2.2, no sig cut off), and
> then used in the subsequent refinement. the results looked encouraging:
> a 5% drop in Rcryst, mirrored by a 5% drop in FreeR. However, when I looked
> at the B-factors, they were significantly higher (20-30 A2) cf. to refinements prior
> to aniso. scaling.
> Does this difference arise from using all reflections when calculating the
> anisotropic scaling?
> It was suggested on the CCP4 bulletin board that anisotropic
> scaling should be performed on a `pruned' data set, eg, 8 to 2.2A, 2sig
> cut off. But the resulting fob file would then be missing the excluded data.
> However, I would like to refine against all the data.
> J Rossjohn
> St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research,
> 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy,
> Victoria 3065
> JAMIER at rubens.its.unimelb.edu.au
| Axel T. Brunger Dept. Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry|
| Professor/Investigator Bass Center, 266 Whitney Avenue |
| Office: 203-432-6143 Howard Hughes Medical Institute/Yale Univ. |
| FAX: 203-432-6946 New Haven, CT 06520, USA. |
| http://xplor.csb.yale.edu/~brunger |
| mailto://firstname.lastname@example.org |
More information about the X-plor