Overall anisotropic B-ref
Mark Banfield
M.Banfield at bris.ac.uk
Tue Jul 7 03:44:59 EST 1998
Hi Savvas,
My 2 cents worth on this would be that if you have good data down to 20
angs., which I guess yours is if it's from a synchrotron (assuming no
overloads - if image plate data), then you should be using it all for
refinement anyway.......
I would think this would be even more important, if not essential, when
using an overall scaling procedure.
Mark
ps- Does anyone think that the CNS example scripts should come with say,
a 20-15 angs. low resolution cut-off, rather than 8 or 5 angs. as for
XPLOR?? I guess this may have been thought of already......
Savvas N. Savvides wrote:
>
> Dear XPLORERS,
> I am in the following situation:
> I have a synchrotron data set (20-2.2 angs) that I would like to scale
> using the overall anisotropic B-factor ref. protocol. I have discovered
> the anisotropy in the data after having carried out several
> rounds of refinement for which I have been using 8-2.2 angs data.
> My question is the following:
> What resolution data should I use in the scaling procedure? Should I
> use all the data or just the data I have been using for refinement?
>
> I would really appreciate any thoughts on this.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Savvas Savvides
>
> *************************************************************************
> * Savvas N. Savvides Email: sns2 at cornell.edu *
> * Program in Biophysics Tel:(607)-255-8432 *
> * Cornell University Fax:(607)-255-2428 *
> * 221 Biotechnology Building *
> * Ithaca, NY 14853 *
> * USA *
> *************************************************************************
--
##
##"In reciprocal space, noone can hear you scream......"
##
## Dr. Mark Banfield
## Dept. of Biochemistry
## University of Bristol
## University Walk
## Bristol
## BS8 1TD
## UK
## email: M.Banfield at bris.ac.uk
## web: http://www.bch.bris.ac.uk/staff/lb/MarkB/index.html
## Phone: 44-(0)117-9289000 x4359
## Fax: 44-(0)117-9288274
More information about the X-plor
mailing list