J. Monahan jmonahn at
Sat Dec 24 18:31:08 EST 1994

It seems to me that this sort of project would be better undertaken by a.) 
gathering the images, 2.) Indexing them in a hypertext form, and 3.) 
distributing the product on CD-ROM.

3M in Minnesota duplicates CDs in quanities of 50+ for around $2.00 each.

I began a searchable graphical database of human parasites for a 
parasitologist here- (at the University of Iowa) A total 0f some 2500 images 
of the species, the effected organs, the habitats and conditions that promote 
infection etc.  All of this fits on a single CD.

Joe Monahan
jmonahn at

In note <15DEC199409303676 at>, mathog at 
(David Mathog) writes: 
>In article <3cl0gt$alv at>, ywchen at (Y. W. 
>>Chen) writes...There are a whole gallery of biologically-related superb 
>>graphic imagesetc.
>We don't really need to spray these all over the Internet, do we?  Seems 
>like a major waste of bandwidth and disk space.
>This isn't to say that biological images aren't valuable, just that a news
>group dedicated to them should probably restrict itself to notices of image
>availability, image content, and some technically related material.  If 
>mixed in with that were a steady stream of images it would dilute the 
>information content and probably get the newsgroup restricted to a very 
>short disk life.
>It *would* be nice if there were a definitive Biology Images Web page, 
>especially one that had some way to search for images by content, something 
>like "list all images of Drosophila wings."
>David Mathog
>mathog at
>Manager, sequence analysis facility, biology division, Caltech 

Joe Monahan
jmonahn at

More information about the Xtal-log mailing list