Commercialised programs

Peter David david at cb-iris.stanford.edu
Thu Feb 10 21:05:23 EST 1994


Simon Brocklehurst (Bioc) (smb18 at mbfs.bio.cam.ac.uk) wrote:
: GOLDMAN at ALA.BTK.UTU.FI (Adrian Goldman, BTK x8029) writes:

: >This announcement, and the fact that the HKL suite of programs for the RAXIS
: >have to bought from MSC (for $1500(!)) made me decide to get other peoples'
: >reactions to the current trend towards commercialised programs.  As far as
: >I am aware most, if not all, of the programs being commercialised are
: >developed using government funding (Austrian, US, etc., etc.) and with a
: >committment to sharing "results".  If the results of some government funding
: >is a coordinate set, we are obliged to deposit it in the PDB for all to use
: >(sometimes without reference to the original work!).

:     This is not so in all parts of the world.  Note that
: Science and Nature are so desparate to get the hottest structures they don't
: require that researchers deposit their coordinates.  J. Mol. Biol. allows
: the coordinates to be put on hold for up to two years after publication.
: This is not really sharing.

 <Stuff deleted>

NOT TRUE!!

	Science now requires the deposition of coordinates; Nature does not.
There has been an exponential increase in the number of structure papers
published in Nature in the last three years.   Draw your own conclusions.

	Peter David




More information about the Xtal-log mailing list