Opinions on rebuilt filaments?

dale at lanl.gov dale at lanl.gov
Wed Dec 13 18:56:28 EST 1995


From: dale at lanl.gov (Dale Hugo Leschnitzer)
Subject: Re: Opinions on rebuilt filaments?
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 16:56:28 -0700

In article <4anfk7$lge at riscsm.scripps.edu>, matt at perutz.salk.edu
(Matthew
Bowen Harrington) wrote:

> We're thinking of using rebuilt filaments from SIS in New Jersey.
> Does anyone have any opinions on this?  The cost savings is
> considerable but not worth it if the rebuilds burn out quickly.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matt Harrington
> The Salk Institute
> 
> --
> MIME me:  matt at sbl.salk.edu

We have had very, very good luck with them.  They are lasting about
80-90%
of the lifetime as brand new ones.  We are not getting the overwhelming
tungsten buildup that I have heard of.  Overall, we are satisfied!

Dale

-- 
The opinions in this message are entirely my own and do not represent
Los Alamos National Laboratory, DOE, or UC policy in any way.

Dale H. Leschnitzer
Los Alamos National Laboratory
dale at lanl.gov


Path:
lynx.unm.edu!jobone!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!ncar
!newshost.lanl.gov!cascade.lanl.gov!user




More information about the Xtal-log mailing list