StpNrrs at aol.com wrote:
> robert bristow-johnson wrote:
>>>in article 1130629424.117822.102680 at f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com,
>>maestro at ultrapiano.com at StpNrrs at aol.com wrote on 10/29/2005 19:43:
>>>>[...]
>> "this known neural bottleneck". Do you mean the disparity in the
> amount of information that the ear sends the brain, at most a few
> thousand haircells firing ten times per second, compared to the
> 44100*16 bits per second required for high-fidelity digital audio
> sound? The same 'known neural bottleneck' occurs in the eyes - about
> 1000000*3*25 bits per second when your're looking at your computer
> monitor.
>
Try this. Fill your monitor with approximately 8 point text, and see how
much you can read with your peripheral vision. Not much, eh?
