From: IN%"postmaster at UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU" "PMDF Mail Server" 12-APR-1993 10:29:17.61
To: IN%"postmaster at UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU", IN%"JAF at UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU"
CC:
Subj: Undeliverable mail: local delivery failure
Received: from UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU by UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU (PMDF #12020) id
<01GWX5F0FJJK0010WH at UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU>; Mon, 12 Apr 1993 10:29 EDT
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1993 10:28 EDT
From: PMDF Mail Server <postmaster at UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU>
Subject: Undeliverable mail: local delivery failure
To: postmaster at UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU, JAF at UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU
Message-id: <01GWX5F0FJJK0010WH at UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU>
The message could not be delivered to:
Addressee: immunology.net.bio.net
Reason:
%MAIL-E-NOSUCHUSR, no such user IMMUNOLOGY.NET.BIO.NET at node UNCVX1
----------------------------------------
Received: from UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU by UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU (PMDF #12020) id
<01GWX5EROGY80010S4 at UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU>; Mon, 12 Apr 1993 10:28 EDT
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1993 10:28 EDT
From: JEFF FRELINGER <JAF at UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU>
Subject: New Review Process
To: immunology.net.bio.net at UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU
Message-id: <01GWX5EROGY80010S4 at UNCVX1.OIT.UNC.EDU>
X-VMS-To: IN%"immunology.net.bio.net"
Forsdyke provides a interesting new model for peer review.
I personally like it, but don't think it would fundamentally
change the outcomes. As a 2 NIH/1VA/ etc review veteran it is clear to
me that a lot of weight is really given ot the past production period
even if it never appears iun the pink sheets. More importantly
this provides no mechanism for new investigators, or to nurture
inovative reseach. Currently most good investigators spend 1/3 to 1/2
of their current grants on getting the preliminary data for the next one.
Given that I don;t see how this will change very much
Jeff Frelinger
