IUBio

Real Function of Immune System

cthoburn at welchlink.welch.jhu.edu Chris
Wed May 17 06:57:56 EST 1995


In article <1995May16.135540.1 at ania.path.ox.ac.uk>, macpherson at molbiol.ox.ac.uk 
writes:

>In article <jcherwon.50.000FFB3F at dres.dnd.ca>, jcherwon at dres.dnd.ca (John 
Cherwonogrodzky) writes:
>> Dear Colleagues:
>>      I'm a bacteriologist, not an immunologist, and found this topic 
>> of discussion fascinating. I recall that several years ago I read where, 
>> instead of my perception that proteins are digested and broken down into 
basic 
>> amino acids, there was a report that large components, if not the whole 
>> protein, got into the blood stream. Is this true?
>>      It struck me that if a protein gets into the blood stream by the 
>> intestinal tract and is tolerated whereas if it is directly injected it may 
>> cause an immune response (anaphylaxis), then there must be some 
"book-keeping" 
>> (labelling , glycosylation, processing, conformational changes) going on to 
>> identify the method of entry. 
>>      Comments?....John
>
>
>John,  Undoubtedly whole proteins can get into the blood from the gut in small 
>amounts and do not seem to be immunogenic, but, if soluble proteins, carefully 
>freed from complexes, aggregates and denatured molecules are injected IV, they 
>are often tolerogenic, despite peptides from them being present as immunogenic 
>complexes with MHC on spenic dendritic cells (Inaba & Steinman).  Similarly, 
>we have shown that after feeding OVA or KLH to rats, DC in the intestinal wall 
>acquire antigen-derived peptides and can present them to sensitized T cells 
>"in vitro" and can sensitize naive T cells "in vivo" (Liu & MacPherson).  We 
>have always puzzled about this anomaly of mature, immunostimulatory DC 
>expressing antigenic peptides but not causing sensitization, and this is where 
>Polly Matzinger's ideas make sense - if the DC require some extra "danger" 
>signal to enable them to activate a resting T cell, all is well (our "in 
>vitro" manipulations of DC may be all that is required to "activate" them).  
>We do not however have any idea what activation of a DC means!  Our 
>lymph-borne DC express high levels of B7 when we collect them. 
>
>Gordon MacPherson
>macpherson at molbiol.ox.ac.uk

When you feed OVA or KLH to these rats, are the DC cells the only antigen 
presenting cells involoved or could perhaps another APC (for instance B cells) 
also present the antigen?  If this is true could then the non-DC APC be 
responsible for inducing tolerance and the DC would not require a 'danger' 
signal?


                     Chris Thobur



More information about the Immuno mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net