From: RABBIT::RABBIT::MRGATE::"MRX_PP::2=400net::3=surf::5=elsevier::4=pigeon::*RFC-822\Johan.Van-Weyenbergh(a)curie.fr::1=nl" 9-SEP-1996 11:10
To: SPIDER::DT04
CC:
Subj: Re: ******PEER REVIEW**************
From: NAME: Johan Van Weyenbergh
FUNC: elsevier <1=nl@*RFC-822\Johan.Van-Weyenbergh(a)curie.fr at 4=pigeon at 5=elsevier at 3=surf at 2=400net at MRX_PP@RABBIT at ESP>
To: NAME: Daniela Orsini
FUNC: elsevier
INITLS: d <DT04 at SPIDER@MRGATE>
RFC-822-Headers:
X-Sender: vawe at mailhost.curie.fr
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (16)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 09:31 09/09/1996 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>>How do you feel about double-blinded peer review (i.e. the reviewer
>does NOT know the author's identity and vice versa)? Do you
>think it would be difficult to avoid phrases like: "we previously
>describes ()..."
>Let me know!
>>Daniela
Great idea ! Might increase objectivity...
In return, what do you think of the open peer review for publishing on
Internet ? I feel tempted to submit something, I guess it is a bit too soon
to judge, but it's nicer to be one of the first than one of the last, isn't it ?
Ciao/groetjes,
Johan
