F. Frank LeFever wrote:
> And maybe say why this fails in some cases--possibly related to the
> "dangerous" (rather than traditional "non-self") concept of immune
> reactions. Sorry: do not recall the name of the woman who has
> developed and presented this concept (featured in NY Times sicence
> section last week???)
>
Polly Matzinger.. She has a paper in Annual Review of Immunology 1994
12:991-1045"Tolerance, danger, and the extended family"