In article <363cf57a.89206252 at netnews.worldnet.att.net>,
<johnburgin at worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>On 1 Nov 1998 05:01:10 GMT, flefever at ix.netcom.com(F. Frank LeFever)
>wrote:
>>>In <363a0c6a.331743786 at netnews.worldnet.att.net>
>>johnburgin at worldnet.att.net writes:
>>>>>>>- - - - - - - -(snip) - - - - - - - -
>>>>>>>>>Read about the real lives of people who go through the ostracism of
>>>being HIV+. Imagine that it were you and you didn't have any risk
>>>factors typically associated with becoming HIV+. Simplify this issue
>>>for the non braniacs who might be cruising this newsgroup for some
>>>help. jb
>>>>>>Is this a clue to what has been (so far, to me, annyway) a perplexing
>>puzzle?
>It's only a puzzle to you, you make things perplexing just as you make
>AIDS a "contagious" disease, the Black Plague of the 20th(soon to be
>21st century). Absolutey pathetic.
> I have been trying to imagine what could drive a man
>I'm quite sure that you are making this far to complicated, I'm simply
>trying to inject(pardon the pun) the truth into this hopelessly and
>needlessly esoteric bs.
I'm sorry you find scientific terminology so confusing. Maybe it's
used here because THIS IS A SCIENTIFIC NEWSGROUP for people to discuss
issues of molecular biology and AIDS. You will find a lay crowd, and
simplified terminology, on misc.health.aids, where this discussion
belongs.
Take your meds
Carlton
