johnburgin at worldnet.att.net wrote:
>On Sun, 04 Oct 1998 19:51:51 GMT, gmc0 at ix.netcom.com (George M.
>Carter) wrote:
>>f.raaphorst at worldonline.nl wrote:
>>>>>In article <6v5q3u$98j at sjx-ixn10.ix.netcom.com>,
>>>gmc0 at ix.netcom.com wrote:
>>>>johnburgin at worldnet.att.net wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hey dipshit!! Get a clue!! The dose of AZT started at 1200 mg. Way
>>>> too much. People died at that dose. It was cut to 600 mg very
>>>> quickly. This was in the late 80s early 90s. That was the
>>>> monotherapy dose. (300 mg probably works as well).
\
>Why not use 300 then?
Good question! But they don't.
> The reality is,
>that you still haven't answered my question. What is the dosage with
>PI's? 600? That's 600mg too much.
They use 600. Can't you read?? Well, asshole, this completely
contradicts your lame assertion that people aren't dropping dead of
"AZT induced AIDS" because the dosage is less. It's not.
>>>> though, people today are STILL taking 600 mg a day. Same dose.
>>>>>>>> So you're just fucking dead cold wrong and dumb as a post.
>Now you're trying to hurt my feelings again by using your extended
>vocabulary(remember, a long time ago we spoke of this, after your
>maxim of 100 usable words you start using profanity).
Your feelings SHOULD be hurt. You're spreading idiocy and
misinformation that could KILL people. You don't like my vocabulary,
well tough titties.
> And you
>>>> claim to be in the medical field.
>No claim, I am, and you're not.
Then god help the medical community. Say--where are you?
Now: face it. You fucked up big time again. As a member of the
medical community, why didn't you bother to find out that people are
taking the same (600 mg) dose of AZT? You wouldn't have made such a
great wanking fool out of yourself.
George M. Carter
