johnburgin at worldnet.att.net wrote:
>>No. It was just dead cold wrong.
>Well, have I moved off of the idiotic list, Mr Carter? I've been
>upgraded to simply dead wrong? I gave you "A" study, I can give you
>lots more with higher doses. Want to keep looking foolish?
No, you're still an idiot, not to worry. And wrong, too.
As to other studies using higher doses, yes, there are.
But let's get to the point.'
>no I didn't. I said higher doses were used than today. Don't mislead
>our audience. Remember, they can read too.
> that people were taking 1200 mg or some high dose until the
>protease inhibitors came along, then the dose dropped.
This was what you claimed originally. That the reason people didn't
die faster on the protease inhibitors was because they took less AZT.
Au contraire, people were taking "less" AZT for several years before
the protease inhibitors came along.
>I'm not trying to support anything except reevaluation of bad drug
>usage for a disease caused by behavior. jb
And time for an announcement of pure bigotry from our psycho dentist.
The above statement is a meaningless generality. Which keeps you
firmly locked in the "idiot" category.
George M. Carter
