On Mon, 12 Oct 1998 17:41:16 GMT, gmc0 at ix.netcom.com (George M.
Carter) wrote:
>johnburgin at worldnet.att.net wrote:
>>>>No. It was just dead cold wrong.
>>Well, have I moved off of the idiotic list, Mr Carter? I've been
>>upgraded to simply dead wrong? I gave you "A" study, I can give you
>>lots more with higher doses. Want to keep looking foolish?
>>No, you're still an idiot, not to worry. And wrong, too.
Gosh, can you just imagine what a hypocrit you must seem like to
people that have now seen you agree that I was correct "TWICE".
>>As to other studies using higher doses, yes, there are.
Touche'
>>But let's get to the point.'
>>>no I didn't. I said higher doses were used than today. Don't mislead
>>our audience. Remember, they can read too.
>> that people were taking 1200 mg or some high dose until the
>>protease inhibitors came along, then the dose dropped.
>>This was what you claimed originally. That the reason people didn't
>die faster on the protease inhibitors was because they took less AZT.
>Au contraire, people were taking "less" AZT for several years before
>the protease inhibitors came along.
Again, it really doesn't matter whether they were taking grapefruit
juice with the AZT, 1 gm. is too much.
>>>I'm not trying to support anything except reevaluation of bad drug
>>usage for a disease caused by behavior. jb
>>And time for an announcement of pure bigotry from our psycho dentist.
>The above statement is a meaningless generality. Which keeps you
>firmly locked in the "idiot" category.
Shame, shame, shame Mr Carter. you, handwaver you! jb
>> George M. Carter
>>>>
