On 22 Oct 1998 16:30:44 GMT, carlton at walleye.ccbr.umn.edu (Carlton
Hogan) wrote:
>In article <362e6758.1314621174 at netnews.worldnet.att.net>,
> <johnburgin at worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>On 21 Oct 1998 16:43:18 GMT, carlton at walleye.ccbr.umn.edu (Carlton
>>Hogan) wrote:
>>>>>In article <362dd6f4.1277652441 at netnews.worldnet.att.net>,
>>> <johnburgin at worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>>>On 16 Oct 1998 17:27:18 GMT, carlton at walleye.ccbr.umn.edu (Carlton
>>>>Hogan) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>In article <3623d68e.622091374 at netnews.worldnet.att.net>,
>>>>> <johnburgin at worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>was so poisonous, or caused AIDS, how could pairing the same dose
>>>>>>>with another nuke *improve* clinical outcome?
>>>>>>Beats me, maybe some kind of reductionist synergism, like mixing two
>>>>>>highly toxic poisons, sodium with Chlorine, to make table salt.
>>>>>>>>>>You have aspired to your loftiest apex of genius yet. Please provide
>>>>>any plausible chemical reaction through which this could occur.
>>>>>>>>2Na + Cl2 > 2 NaCl , um, that was what you wanted, wasn't it? jb
>>>>>>You are wrong about this as well. Na and Cl bond only as ionic forms
>>>dissolved in water. Try and get at least one scientific fact corect
>>>per decade, hmm?
>>>>Well, apparently you are correct. "Technically", that is. Of course,
>>if one were to snort a little Chlorine gas and "pop" a little sodium
>>metal, I would think the results independent of their union(table
>>salt) would be nothing short of disastrous, even if they were, as you
>>say so correctly, only the ionic forms dissolved in water. You can't
>>even spell correct, correctly, meathead. jb
>>I would rather be correct on the facts, and ocassionally make a typo,
>than to excrete laughable and deceptive pseudo-science.
you don't have any facts, you have what people tell you is correct.
What they must tell you is correct or they can't justify the money we,
you and me, are pouring down the drain on junk science. jb
>>Carlton
